Close Menu
 
Mark David Shirian PC: New York City Workplace Toxic Exposure Lawyer
Assertively Fighting for the Rights of Our Clients
New York City Personal Injury Lawyer / New York City Workplace Toxic Exposure Lawyer

New York City Workplace Toxic Exposure Lawyer

Thousands of workers in New York City come into contact with hazardous substances on the job every year, and many never know the damage being done until symptoms appear years or even decades later. Asbestos in aging Manhattan office buildings, chemical solvents used in Brooklyn warehouses, lead dust in Bronx renovation sites, industrial cleaning agents in commercial kitchens, pesticides on landscaping crews – these exposures are real, they are common, and they cause serious, often permanent harm. If your health has deteriorated because of something you were exposed to at work, the law may entitle you to compensation that goes well beyond what a standard workers’ compensation claim can provide. A New York City workplace toxic exposure lawyer can help you understand what happened, who is responsible, and what your case is actually worth.

What makes these cases different from most workplace injury claims is the gap between exposure and diagnosis. Someone who spent years working in a building with deteriorating asbestos insulation may not develop mesothelioma or asbestosis until decades later. A warehouse worker exposed to industrial solvents may not connect their liver damage to a prior job until a physician asks the right questions. By the time people realize they have a legal claim, they may have changed employers, the original worksite may have been demolished or sold, and critical evidence may be harder to locate. That delay does not necessarily bar your claim, but it does make the legal work more complicated, and it makes the choice of who represents you more consequential.

New York law offers multiple pathways for toxic exposure victims, including workers’ compensation benefits, third-party personal injury lawsuits against manufacturers or property owners, and in some circumstances, claims against multiple responsible parties at once. Understanding which avenue applies to your situation, and whether you can pursue more than one, requires a careful look at how you were exposed, what substances were involved, who controlled the worksite, and what your employer knew. The attorneys at Mark David Shirian P.C. handle serious injury claims for workers across New York City and New York State, and they approach toxic exposure cases with the same direct, thorough strategy they bring to every personal injury matter.

Toxic Substances That Commonly Injure New York Workers

  • Asbestos: Still present in many pre-1980 buildings throughout Manhattan, Queens, and the Bronx, asbestos exposure during renovation, demolition, or maintenance work is one of the leading causes of occupational cancer claims in New York, including mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis.
  • Lead: Construction workers, painters, and building maintenance employees in older New York City residential and commercial structures face regular exposure to lead-based paint, which causes neurological damage, cardiovascular effects, and kidney disease with prolonged or repeated contact.
  • Industrial Solvents and Chemicals: Workers in manufacturing, printing, dry cleaning, auto repair, and janitorial roles frequently handle benzene, trichloroethylene, formaldehyde, and related compounds, all of which carry documented links to cancers and organ damage with sustained exposure.
  • Silica Dust: Construction workers cutting concrete, masonry, or stone on New York City jobsites can inhale crystalline silica particles that cause silicosis, a progressive and irreversible lung disease, often within just a few years of heavy exposure.
  • Pesticides and Agricultural Chemicals: Landscaping crews, pest control workers, and agricultural employees working in and around New York City boroughs and surrounding counties face exposure to organophosphates and other compounds that affect the nervous system and have been linked to certain cancers.
  • Mold and Biological Contaminants: Building maintenance workers, remediation crews, and employees in flood-damaged commercial properties across all five boroughs may develop chronic respiratory illness and immune system complications from sustained mold exposure in poorly ventilated environments.
  • Heavy Metals: Welders, foundry workers, and certain manufacturing employees face exposure to manganese, chromium, cadmium, and arsenic, which can cause severe neurological conditions, lung disease, and cancers of the kidney and bladder.

What You Should Do After a Workplace Toxic Exposure in New York

The most important thing you can do after suspecting workplace toxic exposure is to see a physician who understands occupational medicine. General practitioners may not immediately connect your symptoms to occupational causes. New York City has specialists in occupational and environmental medicine at institutions including Mount Sinai’s Selikoff Centers for Occupational Health, which has long served as one of the country’s leading resources for workers dealing with asbestos-related and other occupational diseases. Getting a proper diagnosis with documented causation is the foundation of any legal claim. Ask your doctor to note in writing what substances you were exposed to, for how long, and how that exposure relates to your condition.

Document everything you can about the exposure itself. Note the specific worksite addresses, your job duties, the substances you handled or worked near, any safety data sheets or chemical labels you can locate, and the names of coworkers who witnessed the same conditions. If your employer provided any personal protective equipment, note whether it was adequate for the exposure levels involved. Photograph any visible contamination, deteriorating materials, or hazardous conditions if you still have access to the site. If OSHA received any complaints about the location or conducted any inspections, those records may be obtainable and can be significant evidence in your case.

Under New York workers’ compensation law, you are required to notify your employer of a work-related illness or injury within a specific time after you knew or should have known the condition was work-related. For occupational diseases with latency periods, New York courts have held that this clock typically starts when you receive a medical diagnosis linking your condition to your work. Missing this notice window can jeopardize your workers’ compensation claim, so speaking with an attorney as early as possible after diagnosis matters. Workers’ compensation claims in New York are filed with the New York State Workers’ Compensation Board, which maintains a district office in Manhattan at 215 West 125th Street and processes claims for workers throughout the five boroughs.

Critically, workers’ compensation is not always your only option. If a third party, such as the manufacturer of a defective respirator, the owner of a property who failed to disclose known asbestos hazards, or a chemical company that mislabeled its products, contributed to your exposure, you may be able to file a separate personal injury lawsuit in New York Supreme Court. These third-party cases can produce damages for pain and suffering, lost future earning capacity, and other losses that workers’ compensation does not cover. The two claims can sometimes proceed simultaneously. This is where having a workplace toxic exposure attorney in New York who handles both workers’ compensation strategy and civil litigation becomes genuinely valuable.

How Liability Works in Occupational Toxic Exposure Cases

One of the biggest misconceptions workers carry into these cases is that their employer is the only party who can be held responsible. In reality, toxic exposure cases frequently involve multiple defendants, because exposure rarely traces back to a single decision made by one person. A construction worker who developed silicosis may have a claim against the general contractor who failed to control dust, the subcontractor who directed the cutting work, the manufacturer of the equipment that generated the dust, and possibly the property owner who hired the construction team. Sorting through that web of responsibility is exactly the kind of work that a personal injury attorney experienced in these cases knows how to do.

Product liability is a significant branch of toxic exposure law. Chemical manufacturers and industrial equipment companies owe duties to the workers who will foreseeably come into contact with their products. When a company knew its product posed serious health risks, failed to warn users adequately, or designed safety measures that were deficient, it can be held liable for injuries those products cause. New York courts have handled significant product liability litigation involving asbestos-containing materials, industrial chemicals, and defective protective equipment, and those precedents shape how current cases are evaluated and litigated.

Property owner liability is another avenue that matters in New York City specifically. With a large share of the commercial building stock dating back many decades, building owners who lease or license space to employers bear their own obligations under New York law regarding the condition of that property. An employer’s knowledge of asbestos, lead paint, or mold contamination, combined with a failure to remediate or warn, can support claims directly against the property owner independent of the employment relationship. The density of New York City’s commercial real estate market means these overlapping obligations arise regularly in exposure cases here.

Why Mark David Shirian P.C. Handles These Cases the Way It Does

Mark David Shirian P.C. was founded in 2016 with a specific focus: helping people who have been wronged. The firm handles serious personal injury cases across New York City and New York State, and its approach to every matter starts with a careful assessment of what actually happened and what the client genuinely needs going forward. That orientation, deliberate and strategic rather than reactive, is exactly what toxic exposure cases require. These are not cases where speed substitutes for analysis. They require understanding the medical record, identifying every potentially responsible party, and building a theory of liability that holds up under scrutiny.

Founding Member Mark D. Shirian and Senior Associate Shawn D. Shirian both bring their advocacy directly to clients, with the firm consistently described by clients as attentive, communicative, and willing to fight. Client feedback highlights the firm’s close attention to case details and its genuine commitment to pursuing the best available outcome. For workers dealing with a serious occupational illness, that combination of thoroughness and personal attention matters practically. You need attorneys who will take the time to understand your medical history, coordinate with expert witnesses, and handle the legal complexity while keeping you informed at every stage.

The firm has recovered millions on behalf of clients across its practice areas. Toxic exposure claims involving serious illness, long-term disability, or reduced life expectancy can involve substantial damages, and the firm approaches those cases with the preparation and resolve that significant claims demand. As a New York City workplace toxic exposure attorney, Mark D. Shirian understands that the firms and insurers on the other side of these cases are not going to offer fair compensation voluntarily. Getting there requires the kind of persistent, detail-oriented representation this firm was built to provide.

Questions New York Workers Ask About Toxic Exposure Claims

How long do I have to file a toxic exposure claim in New York?

The statute of limitations for a personal injury claim in New York is generally three years from the date of injury or discovery of the injury’s cause. For occupational diseases with long latency periods, New York courts typically start that clock from when you knew or reasonably should have known that your condition was caused by workplace exposure, not from the moment of exposure itself. Workers’ compensation claims have their own notice and filing requirements that differ from civil lawsuit deadlines. Because these timelines interact in complicated ways depending on your diagnosis and the parties involved, getting legal guidance early in the process is genuinely important.

Can I sue my employer directly for toxic exposure in New York?

Generally, workers’ compensation is the exclusive remedy against your direct employer for a work-related illness or injury in New York, meaning you cannot sue your employer in civil court. However, this exclusivity does not apply to third parties such as manufacturers, contractors, property owners, or other entities whose negligence contributed to your exposure. In many toxic exposure cases, the most significant legal recovery actually comes through those third-party claims rather than through workers’ compensation alone.

What if the company that exposed me has gone out of business?

This is a common situation in asbestos and older chemical exposure cases. Companies that manufactured asbestos-containing products have frequently dissolved or reorganized, but many established bankruptcy trusts specifically to compensate victims of their products. These trusts continue to pay claims even though the companies no longer operate. An attorney handling your case would research which trusts apply to your exposure history and file claims on your behalf. In some cases, successor companies or insurers of defunct businesses may also carry liability.

What damages can I recover beyond workers’ compensation benefits?

Workers’ compensation in New York covers medical expenses and a portion of lost wages, but it does not compensate for pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, or the full value of lost future earning capacity. A successful third-party personal injury lawsuit can address all of these. For workers diagnosed with serious conditions like mesothelioma, lung cancer, or severe silicosis, the gap between workers’ compensation benefits and full civil damages can be substantial. That gap is one of the primary reasons pursuing both avenues simultaneously makes sense when the facts support it.

I wore protective equipment. Does that hurt my claim?

Not necessarily. Many toxic exposure injuries occur even when workers use equipment that was supposed to protect them, because the equipment was defective, inadequate for the actual exposure level, or improperly fitted. In those situations, the equipment manufacturer or the employer who selected inadequate gear may actually bear liability for the failure. Your claim does not disappear simply because safety gear was present. What matters is whether the protection provided was genuinely sufficient, and whether anyone responsible for your safety knew or should have known that it was not.

Can I still file a claim if I was exposed at multiple jobs or worksites?

Yes. Exposure at multiple sites or across multiple employers does not eliminate your claim; it complicates the question of how liability is apportioned. New York courts and the workers’ compensation system have mechanisms for handling exactly this situation. In civil litigation, where multiple defendants contributed to a plaintiff’s exposure, liability can be divided among them. An attorney handling your case would work to identify every worksite and every employer or third party with potential responsibility, and build your claim against the appropriate combination of defendants.

My exposure happened years ago. Is it too late to pursue a claim?

It depends significantly on when you were diagnosed and what the specific circumstances are. Because New York’s discovery rule allows the limitations period to begin when you knew or should have known about the connection between your illness and your exposure, people diagnosed recently with conditions caused by historical exposure often still have viable claims. The more important factor is not waiting further once you do have a diagnosis. Evidence becomes harder to gather as time passes, and certain filing deadlines are unforgiving. A consultation with a New York workplace toxic exposure attorney will give you a clear picture of where you stand.

What if my employer retaliated against me for reporting unsafe conditions?

New York State Labor Law and federal OSHA regulations both prohibit employer retaliation against workers who report unsafe working conditions or file workers’ compensation claims. If you experienced reduced hours, demotion, termination, or other adverse action after raising concerns about toxic exposure or filing a claim, you may have a separate retaliation claim in addition to your injury claim. The firm handles employment law matters alongside personal injury cases, which means this dimension of your situation does not have to be handled by a different team.

How do I prove that my illness was caused by my workplace exposure and not something else?

Causation is typically established through expert medical testimony. An occupational medicine physician or toxicologist can review your work history, your exposure levels, and your medical records to render an opinion about whether your condition is more likely than not the result of workplace exposure. Many occupational diseases have recognized patterns that make this analysis more straightforward than it might initially seem. Conditions like mesothelioma, for example, have a very high association with asbestos exposure, which means causation is often less contested than other elements of the case.

Does it matter if I was an independent contractor rather than an employee?

It can affect the workers’ compensation analysis, since independent contractors are generally not covered by New York’s workers’ compensation system in the same way employees are. However, it does not bar third-party personal injury claims. If a manufacturer, property owner, or other third party’s negligence caused your exposure, your employment classification does not insulate them from liability. In some cases, the contractor classification itself may be worth examining, since employers sometimes misclassify workers, and reclassification can open up additional avenues for recovery.

Workplace Toxic Exposure Representation Across New York City and Beyond

Mark David Shirian P.C. represents workers throughout all five boroughs and the broader New York metropolitan area. In Manhattan, the firm handles claims arising from construction sites in Midtown and Lower Manhattan, office buildings throughout the Upper East Side and Upper West Side, and industrial and commercial properties from Harlem down through the Financial District. In Brooklyn, clients come to the firm from neighborhoods including Bushwick, Greenpoint, Red Hook, Sunset Park, and East New York, areas with substantial concentrations of older industrial buildings and ongoing construction activity. In Queens, the firm serves workers from Long Island City, Flushing, Jamaica, Astoria, and the communities surrounding JFK International Airport, where aviation maintenance and logistics workers face chemical exposures specific to that environment.

The Bronx and Staten Island are also part of the firm’s active service area, with clients from the South Bronx’s industrial corridors, the Concourse and Fordham neighborhoods, and Staten Island’s commercial and residential construction sectors. Beyond the five boroughs, the firm represents workers from communities across New York State, including those in Nassau County, Suffolk County, Westchester County, and Rockland County, where workers commute into New York City jobsites or face exposures at local industrial facilities. Whether a client’s exposure happened at a construction site in Midtown, a warehouse in the Bronx, a factory in Long Island City, or a commercial building in White Plains, the firm evaluates the claim and pursues it in the appropriate venue, including New York Supreme Court in the county where the case belongs.

Talk to a New York City Workplace Toxic Exposure Attorney About Your Case

An illness caused by workplace exposure does not resolve itself, and the compensation systems available to you will not advocate for your best outcome on their own. A New York City workplace toxic exposure attorney at Mark David Shirian P.C. can review what happened, identify every responsible party, and map out the full range of claims available to you given your specific diagnosis and work history. The firm’s approach has always been direct: assess the situation carefully, understand what the client needs, and then work strategically to achieve it.

If your health has been damaged by something you were exposed to at work, call Mark David Shirian P.C. for a confidential case evaluation. The firm represents seriously injured workers across New York City and New York State and handles these cases with the thoroughness and personal attention that complex, high-stakes claims require. Reach out today to speak with a workplace toxic exposure lawyer in New York who will take the time to understand your situation and give you a straight answer about where your case stands.

Dedicated To the satisfaction of our clients
He worked very hard to get the outcome that we both were looking for.

“In March of 2017, I had a wrongful job termination that distressed me… Read More

Mark pays close attention to details that are important for your case. I recommend him.

“An amazing attorney goes above and beyond for his clients. Mark pays close… Read More

Very compassionate and hard-working lawyer.

“Very compassionate and hard-working lawyer, fights hard for me and keeps me informed,… Read More

* Required Field

By submitting this form I acknowledge that contacting Mark David Shirian P.C. through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege. Furthermore, by submitting this form, I agree to be contacted about my request & other information using automated technology. (Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel.)
Acceptable Use Policy

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms