Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
 
Mark David Shirian PC: Long Island Sports Hazing Lawyer
Assertively Fighting for the Rights of Our Clients
New York City Personal Injury Lawyer / Long Island Sports Hazing Lawyer

Long Island Sports Hazing Lawyer

A teammate comes home from a preseason “bonding” night on Long Island hurt, humiliated, or unwilling to say what happened, and the family is left deciding whether this was a rite of passage or a legal wrong. Mark David Shirian P.C. represents injured people and families across New York in personal injury, college hazing, and sports injury claims, and works with clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, and the greater New York region. If you are looking for a Long Island sports hazing lawyer, the firm can evaluate what happened to you or your child and who should answer for it.

Hazing in athletics rarely looks like what people picture. It can be forced drinking after a game, being made to perform degrading acts on a bus ride home, “initiation” workouts pushed past the point of injury, or isolation and threats aimed at rookies and walk-ons. It happens on high school fields, in club programs, and in college locker rooms, and the people who watch it happen are often coaches, captains, or administrators with the power to stop it. Families usually discover the real story late, after an injury, a hospital visit, or a sudden change in a young athlete’s behavior.

The decisions made in the first days and weeks matter more than most families realize. Evidence in group chats disappears, teams close ranks, and deadlines for suing schools and public entities are far shorter than the ordinary limit for injury claims. Knowing what New York law actually says about hazing, and who can be held responsible beyond the students involved, is where a sound strategy begins.

Why Choose Mark David Shirian P.C. for a Sports Hazing Claim

Mark David Shirian P.C. is a New York litigation firm that handles personal injury, employment, sports and entertainment, and civil and commercial matters, with hazing, sports injury, daycare negligence, and Troubled Teen Industry abuse among its listed practice areas. The firm serves clients in New York City, Nassau County, Suffolk County, Westchester County, and across the region. Every case is handled directly by one of the firm’s attorneys rather than a case manager, and the firm pairs large-firm experience with the personal attention of a boutique practice. Case evaluations are free and confidential, and personal injury cases are handled on a contingency fee basis, so there is no fee unless there is a recovery.

Mark D. Shirian, Founding Member, leads the firm’s litigation practice and concentrates in personal injury, sports and entertainment law, employment law, and civil and commercial litigation. He has obtained multiple seven-figure settlements and has challenged Fortune 500 companies, school systems, and government entities, which are exactly the kinds of defendants that sit behind many hazing cases. He is admitted in New York and in the S.D.N.Y. and E.D.N.Y. federal courts, was named to The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40, received the NAOPIA Top 10 Attorney Award, and belongs to the American Association for Justice, the New York State Trial Lawyers Association, the New York State Academy of Trial Lawyers, and the Sports Lawyers Association. His work has been featured by NBC, ABC, Fox News, The New York Times, The New York Post, and Daily News.

Shawn D. Shirian, Senior Associate, brings more than seven years of litigation experience, including jury trials and dispositive motions, and has defended major corporate clients in premises liability cases. That background gives the firm a view from the defense side of how institutions build their responses to a hazing claim.

Results the firm has obtained include a $1,500,000 Child Victims Act settlement, a $500,000 daycare injury to a minor settlement, a $1,000,000 wrongful death settlement, and a $1,500,000 Transit Authority bus accident settlement, the last of which reflects experience pursuing claims against public entities. Client reviews, reflected in an Excellent rating across 96 Google reviews, repeatedly describe honesty and directness, clear communication, attention to detail, and genuine compassion, along with hard-working, tenacious advocacy. Families dealing with a hazing injury often need all of those at once.

Forms of Athletic Hazing and Who May Be Responsible

  • Forced Alcohol Consumption: Drinking “rituals” after games, at team dinners, or during off-campus gatherings can cause alcohol poisoning, falls, and car crashes. Beyond the students who pressured the victim, the host of the gathering, the team’s adult leadership, and sometimes a school or club that knew about the tradition may share responsibility.
  • Physical Initiation and Excessive Conditioning: Punishing workouts, forced fights, paddling, or “gauntlet” activities can produce fractures, concussions, rhabdomyolysis, and lasting orthopedic damage. When a coach assigns or tolerates the exercise, the claim looks like a sports injury case with a negligent supervision theory layered on top.
  • Sexualized or Degrading Rituals: Forced nudity, simulated sexual acts, and humiliation stunts on buses or in locker rooms cause serious psychological injury. These cases can overlap with the firm’s Child Victims Act and abuse experience when the victim was a minor.
  • Isolation, Threats, and Cyber Harassment: Group-chat intimidation, shunning, and threats of being cut from the team can drive anxiety, depression, and withdrawal from school. Preserved messages are often the most persuasive proof of what leadership knew.
  • Bus, Travel, and Overnight Trip Incidents: Away games, tournaments, and training trips put athletes outside normal supervision. Questions about chaperone ratios, room assignments, and who was in charge become central.
  • Club, Travel, and Private Program Hazing: Private clubs and travel teams on Long Island may carry their own insurance and have different oversight than a school district, which changes who can be sued and what deadlines apply.
  • College Athletic Team Hazing: University teams face institutional duties under campus conduct rules and federal disclosure requirements. Claims can target the institution, the program, individual students, and sometimes the team’s alumni or booster-linked organizations.
  • Hazing That Ends in Death: When an initiation event proves fatal, the family may bring a wrongful death claim in addition to whatever criminal proceedings follow, and the deadlines for each run on different clocks.

What to Do in the Days After a Hazing Incident

The first priority is medical care, even if the injury seems minor or the athlete insists they are fine. Hazing injuries are often concealed, and concussions, alcohol toxicity, and internal injuries can worsen quietly. Whichever Nassau County or Suffolk County hospital, urgent care, or pediatrician sees the athlete, make sure the records reflect the real cause of the injury, not a cover story the team supplied. Honest records protect the claim later.

Next, preserve everything before it vanishes. Screenshot group chats, social media posts, videos, and messages, and save them in more than one place. Write down names, dates, locations, and who was present, including coaches, advisors, and anyone who looked away. Keep the clothing, receipts, and photographs of injuries. Do not delete anything, and do not confront the team, the coach, or other families in a way that invites a coordinated story to emerge. Speak with a lawyer before giving a recorded statement to a school, an insurer, or an investigator.

Deadlines deserve early attention because they differ by defendant. The general New York limit for personal injury is three years from the date of injury, and a person who was under 18 when hurt generally has three years from their eighteenth birthday, which effectively means age 21. Claims against a public school district or other municipal entity are much tighter: a Notice of Claim generally must be served within 90 days after the claim arises, and suit against a municipality must be commenced within one year and 90 days of the incident. A late Notice of Claim requires a special proceeding in Supreme Court, and a court cannot extend the time beyond one year and 90 days. If an athlete dies, a wrongful death action must be brought within two years of the death, and where a criminal case is brought against the same defendant for the same event, the family has at least one year after that criminal case ends. In a municipal wrongful death case, the 90-day Notice of Claim period runs from the appointment of the estate’s representative.

Civil cases from Long Island hazing incidents are typically filed in the Supreme Court in Nassau County, which sits in Mineola, or in Suffolk County Supreme Court, where non-matrimonial civil matters are heard in Riverhead. Federal claims may belong in the Eastern District of New York, which includes Nassau and Suffolk and holds court in Central Islip. A criminal complaint is a separate track handled by police and prosecutors, and a family can report the conduct to law enforcement while also pursuing a civil claim. A common mistake is waiting to see whether the school “handles it internally.” Internal discipline does not stop any legal clock, and school investigations are not designed to maximize your recovery.

How New York Treats Hazing and Shared Fault

New York has a hazing statute in its Penal Law. Hazing in the first degree applies when someone, intentionally or recklessly, engages in conduct during another person’s initiation into or affiliation with an organization that creates a substantial risk of physical injury and actually causes that injury. It is a class A misdemeanor, which carries a definite sentence of up to 364 days and a fine of up to $1,000, or up to double any gain from the offense. Hazing in the second degree covers the same risky conduct without requiring that an injury result, and it is a violation rather than a crime. These criminal provisions matter, but they are modest compared to the civil remedies, and a criminal outcome does not decide what a civil jury may award.

Colleges operate under additional rules. Education Law Article 129-A, known as the Henderson Rules, governs public order on campuses, and institutions such as CUNY apply it to prohibit conduct that recklessly or intentionally endangers physical or mental health, including forced consumption of liquor or drugs, for the purpose of initiation or affiliation. The federal Stop Campus Hazing Act also requires colleges to report hazing incidents through their annual security reports and to run hazing education and prevention programs. Those records can become important evidence of what an institution knew and when.

Defendants often argue that the athlete “agreed” to participate. In New York, a claimant’s own culpable conduct, including contributory negligence or assumption of risk, does not bar recovery; it only reduces damages in proportion to the claimant’s share of fault. A newer rule that can bar recovery when the claimant is more at fault applies only to personal injury actions subject to Insurance Law Article 51, which is the no-fault auto context, not to most hazing claims. For hazing and wrongful death cases, pure comparative fault continues to apply. Peer pressure, power imbalances within a team, and the fear of losing a roster spot all bear on how much responsibility a young athlete realistically carries, and a careful presentation of that context is part of the work.

Common Questions About Long Island Sports Hazing Claims

Is hazing illegal in New York?

Yes. New York’s Penal Law makes hazing in the first degree a class A misdemeanor when risky initiation conduct causes physical injury, and hazing in the second degree a violation when the same risky conduct occurs without injury. Separate from criminal law, hazing can support a civil lawsuit for damages.

Can I sue if my child agreed to take part in the ritual?

Agreement does not end the claim. Under New York’s comparative fault rule, an athlete’s own conduct reduces damages by that share of responsibility rather than eliminating recovery. Courts and juries understand that consent given under team pressure is not the same as free choice.

Who can be held responsible besides the students who did it?

Depending on the facts, responsible parties can include coaches, advisors, the school or district, a private club or league, the college or university, a host who supplied alcohol or space, and sometimes a national or alumni organization. Identifying the party with real oversight authority often determines how strong the case is.

How long do I have to file a hazing lawsuit?

The general limit is three years from the injury. A minor generally has three years from turning 18. Claims against a school district or other municipal body require a Notice of Claim within 90 days, and suit generally must be started within one year and 90 days of the incident. A wrongful death claim must be filed within two years of the death.

What if the hazing happened at a public school?

Public school districts are municipal entities, so the 90-day Notice of Claim rule applies. Missing it can seriously damage a claim, and a late filing requires court permission through a special proceeding. Contact a lawyer quickly if a district or public program is involved.

Should I report hazing to the police, or just the school?

You can do both, and reporting to a school does not replace a police report. A criminal case and a civil case run independently. A lawyer can help you decide the order and timing so that your statements, evidence, and deadlines are all protected.

Will my child be kicked off the team or lose a scholarship for coming forward?

Retaliation is a real fear, and it is often why hazing stays hidden. Retaliation can itself create additional legal exposure for a school or program. Document any change in playing time, communication, or treatment after a report, because that pattern can support the claim.

Can my own social media posts or texts hurt the case?

They can be used by the defense, so avoid posting about the incident, the team, or your injuries, and never delete existing messages. Deleting evidence can damage credibility and may carry sanctions. A lawyer can advise how to preserve content properly.

How long does a hazing case take on Long Island?

Timing varies with the number of defendants, whether a criminal case is pending, and whether an institution contests liability. Cases against schools and public entities add procedural steps. Settlement can come at different stages, but a family should plan for a process measured in months to years, not weeks.

Does a hazing claim cost anything to start?

The firm offers free, confidential evaluations, and personal injury cases are handled on a contingency fee basis, meaning no fee unless there is a recovery.

What compensation can be recovered in a hazing case?

Recoverable damages can include medical expenses, future treatment such as therapy for psychological harm, pain and suffering, lost opportunities such as an athletic scholarship tied to the injury, and, in a death case, the losses recognized under New York’s wrongful death law. The specific categories depend on the injury and the evidence.

Can a hazing victim bring a case years after leaving the school?

Possibly. Because of infancy tolling, a victim who was a minor at the time may still have time up to age 21 for most claims. Some abuse-related claims involving minors have separate rules, so even an older incident is worth discussing with a lawyer promptly.

Serving Sports Hazing Clients From Nassau and Suffolk Across the Region

Mark David Shirian P.C. handles hazing and sports injury claims for families throughout Nassau County, including Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, and Great Neck, and welcomes matters from across Suffolk County, where families may be dealing with school districts, travel clubs, and college teams of every size. The firm’s reach on Long Island connects naturally to New York City, and the firm represents clients in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten Island, as well as in Westchester County communities such as Yonkers, White Plains, Mount Vernon, and New Rochelle.

The firm also accepts matters from Rockland County and other parts of the greater New York region. Athletes often compete far from home, in leagues and tournaments that cross county lines, so a hazing incident may occur in one place while the family lives in another. Wherever the team practiced or traveled, the firm can look at the supervising institution and decide the right court and the right defendants.

Speak With a Long Island Sports Hazing Attorney Today

If your child or someone you love was hurt, humiliated, or pressured during a team initiation, speaking with a Long Island sports hazing attorney sooner rather than later can protect evidence and preserve the short deadlines that apply to schools and public entities. Mark David Shirian P.C. offers confidential, free case evaluations, and every case is handled directly by one of the firm’s attorneys. Call today to talk through what happened and learn what options your family has.

Dedicated To the satisfaction of our clients
He worked very hard to get the outcome that we both were looking for.

“In March of 2017, I had a wrongful job termination that distressed me… Read More”

Mark pays close attention to details that are important for your case. I recommend him.

“An amazing attorney goes above and beyond for his clients. Mark pays close… Read More”

Very compassionate and hard-working lawyer.

“Very compassionate and hard-working lawyer, fights hard for me and keeps me informed,… Read More”

* Required Field

By submitting this form I acknowledge that contacting Mark David Shirian P.C. through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege. Furthermore, by submitting this form, I agree to be contacted about my request & other information using automated technology. (Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel.)
Acceptable Use Policy

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms