Close Menu
 
Mark David Shirian PC: Long Island Misdiagnosis Lawyer
Assertively Fighting for the Rights of Our Clients
New York City Personal Injury Lawyer / Long Island Misdiagnosis Lawyer

Long Island Misdiagnosis Lawyer

A doctor’s failure to correctly identify what is wrong with a patient is not simply a regrettable mistake. When a misdiagnosis leads to delayed treatment, unnecessary procedures, or the complete absence of care for a serious condition, the consequences can reshape a person’s life permanently. Cancer that goes undetected for months while it spreads to neighboring tissue, a heart attack dismissed as acid reflux, a stroke misread as an anxiety episode, these are not rare hypotheticals. They are the kinds of failures that bring people to a Long Island misdiagnosis lawyer after the harm has already been done and cannot be fully undone.

On Long Island, patients travel through a dense web of hospitals, urgent care centers, specialty clinics, and private physician offices. Nassau and Suffolk County residents receive care at facilities ranging from large academic medical centers to smaller community hospitals, and the quality of diagnostic attention can vary considerably across that network. The complexity of the healthcare landscape here means that a misdiagnosis can involve one provider or several, a single missed test or a chain of overlooked findings spread across multiple encounters. Tracing where the failure occurred, who was responsible, and how it altered the trajectory of a patient’s health requires both medical knowledge and legal precision.

Mark David Shirian P.C. represents victims of serious injury and catastrophic harm across New York City and New York State, including Long Island. Our firm handles personal injury cases with the same assertive, detail-oriented approach we apply to every area of our practice. Misdiagnosis claims are among the most demanding medical malpractice matters because they require proving not only that a mistake was made, but that the mistake deviated from the standard of care and caused measurable injury. If you or someone close to you has suffered because a diagnosis was wrong, missed, or delayed, we are here to assess what happened and what your legal options are.

What Misdiagnosis Claims Actually Cover on Long Island

  • Missed cancer diagnoses: Failure to order appropriate imaging, biopsy, or screening for breast, colon, lung, or prostate cancer is among the most common and devastating diagnostic errors, allowing a treatable condition to progress to an advanced or terminal stage before intervention begins.
  • Delayed stroke or TIA recognition: Neurological events are frequently misread as migraines, intoxication, or vertigo in emergency settings, and the resulting delay in clot-busting treatment or surgical intervention can leave a patient with permanent disability that early intervention would have prevented or reduced.
  • Cardiac event misclassification: Heart attacks and other acute coronary events are regularly dismissed, particularly in women and younger patients, as musculoskeletal pain, anxiety, or gastrointestinal symptoms, with catastrophic results when the underlying emergency goes untreated.
  • Infectious disease failure: Sepsis, meningitis, Lyme disease (which is prevalent across Long Island’s suburban and wooded communities in Nassau and Suffolk County), and other infections can escalate rapidly when diagnostic delays allow them to advance without appropriate antibiotic or critical care treatment.
  • Incorrect psychiatric diagnosis: Organic conditions including thyroid disorders, brain tumors, or vitamin deficiencies can present with psychiatric symptoms and are sometimes labeled as depression, bipolar disorder, or psychosis, leading to years of ineffective psychiatric treatment while the underlying physical condition worsens.
  • Radiology and pathology interpretation errors: A misread X-ray, CT scan, MRI, or biopsy slide can send a patient’s care in the entirely wrong direction, creating a cascade of incorrect treatment decisions built on a faulty foundation.
  • Pediatric misdiagnosis: Children cannot always articulate their symptoms accurately, and diagnostic errors in pediatric patients, including missed appendicitis, meningitis, or developmental conditions, can carry consequences that extend across a lifetime of health and function.

Why Mark David Shirian P.C. for a Long Island Misdiagnosis Case

Founded in 2016, Mark David Shirian P.C. was built around a straightforward commitment: to help those who have been wronged. Attorneys Mark D. Shirian and Shawn D. Shirian approach each case with what the firm has always described as assertive, dependable, creative, and honest advocacy. With millions recovered on behalf of clients across New York, the firm brings the depth of a firm that has handled serious personal injury and malpractice matters at scale, combined with the direct access and individualized attention that distinguishes a focused boutique practice. Clients consistently describe their experience working with this firm as one where they felt heard, where the attorney paid close attention to the details that actually mattered, and where the effort extended beyond routine case management into genuine advocacy.

Misdiagnosis cases on Long Island require an attorney who can hold sophisticated medical institutions and their insurers accountable through rigorous preparation and litigation readiness. The defense teams retained by hospitals and physician groups do not respond to weak or under-developed claims. A Long Island medical malpractice attorney who has handled serious personal injury litigation, who understands how to reconstruct the standard of care through expert analysis and documentary review, and who is prepared to take a case to trial when necessary brings something meaningfully different to this type of representation. That is the approach this firm takes. If you are evaluating a misdiagnosis attorney serving Long Island, the right question is not which firm makes the biggest promises, but which firm will do the actual work your case demands.

What Needs to Happen When You Suspect a Misdiagnosis

The first and most urgent practical step is obtaining your complete medical records. In New York, patients have a legal right to access their records, and you should request everything, from every provider involved in your care during the relevant period, as soon as possible. This includes physician notes, lab results, imaging studies and their interpretations, referral communications, and any documentation of the conversations your providers had about your condition. These records form the evidentiary foundation of a misdiagnosis claim, and their completeness matters enormously.

New York’s statute of limitations for medical malpractice, which is the category under which misdiagnosis claims fall, is generally two and a half years from the date of the malpractice act or omission. However, this timeline is affected by specific rules including the continuous treatment doctrine, which can toll the limitations period while a patient remains under continuous care from the same provider for the same condition, and special rules that apply to minor plaintiffs. Missing the applicable deadline ends your ability to pursue compensation, regardless of how strong your underlying claim might be. Because the calculation of these deadlines is genuinely fact-specific, consulting with a misdiagnosis attorney in Long Island as early as possible is essential, not to create urgency artificially, but because time actually does erode options in this area of law.

In New York, medical malpractice plaintiffs are required to file a Certificate of Merit along with their complaint, certifying that a licensed physician has been consulted and has provided a reasonable basis to believe that the defendant departed from accepted medical practice. This requirement reflects the threshold scrutiny that applies to these cases from the very beginning. A Long Island misdiagnosis attorney must have the relationships and the process to engage qualified medical experts early, because expert support is not optional in these cases. It is the structural requirement that allows the claim to proceed.

Cases arising from care at Long Island hospitals may be litigated in Nassau County Supreme Court or Suffolk County Supreme Court depending on where the treatment occurred and where the relevant parties are located. Both courts handle a significant volume of medical malpractice litigation, and understanding the procedural expectations and case management practices in each venue is part of effective representation at the local level.

The Actual Harm That Misdiagnosis Causes and What Compensation Addresses

Misdiagnosis does not produce uniform harm. The consequences depend on what condition was missed, how long the error persisted, what treatment was given in the meantime, and what the trajectory of the condition would have been with correct and timely diagnosis. A cancer caught at Stage I and treated immediately has a dramatically different prognosis than the same cancer identified at Stage III after months of diagnostic delay. The difference between those two trajectories, in medical cost, in treatment burden, in years of life, and in physical suffering, is what a misdiagnosis claim seeks to measure and compensate.

Compensation in a successful misdiagnosis case can include the cost of medical treatment that became necessary because the correct diagnosis was delayed, the cost of treatment for a condition that would have been avoided entirely had the right diagnosis been made at the right time, and future medical expenses tied to the worsened condition. Lost income, both past and future, is recoverable when the harm has affected a patient’s ability to work. Pain and suffering, the physical experience of an illness that was allowed to worsen, and the emotional burden of learning that a preventable failure altered the course of your health, are recognized categories of damages under New York law. In cases involving wrongful death from a missed diagnosis, surviving family members may have separate claims for the losses they have sustained.

New York does not cap economic damages in medical malpractice cases, though non-economic damages are subject to scrutiny at trial. The full value of a misdiagnosis case depends on a rigorous accounting of every way the error touched the patient’s life. Building that account requires both legal advocacy and credible expert testimony on what correct diagnosis and treatment would have produced.

Questions People Ask About Misdiagnosis Cases in New York

What is the difference between a misdiagnosis and a diagnostic error?

These terms are often used interchangeably, but both describe situations where the diagnosis a patient received was wrong. A misdiagnosis might mean identifying the wrong condition entirely. A diagnostic error is a broader category that includes delayed diagnoses, where the correct diagnosis was eventually made but much later than it should have been, and missed diagnoses, where a condition was never identified at all. All three can form the basis of a malpractice claim when they reflect a departure from the standard of care that caused harm.

Does a wrong diagnosis automatically mean the doctor committed malpractice?

No. Medicine involves uncertainty, and not every diagnostic error rises to the level of legal malpractice. The legal question is whether the physician’s diagnostic process fell below what a reasonably competent physician in the same specialty would have done under similar circumstances. If a reasonable physician would also have made the same call given the available information, the claim may not succeed even if the diagnosis was wrong. The inquiry focuses on the process, not just the outcome.

How do you prove what would have happened with a correct diagnosis?

This is the causation question, and it is one of the most contested elements of any misdiagnosis case. Expert physicians in the relevant specialty must testify about how the condition would have responded to timely, correct treatment and how the delay affected prognosis, survival odds, or quality of life. This analysis is often drawn from published medical literature, treatment guidelines, and clinical data specific to the condition and its typical progression. Building this evidence requires the right medical experts and sufficient time to develop their opinions properly.

Can I still bring a claim if I had other health problems that complicated the diagnosis?

Yes. Pre-existing conditions or concurrent health issues complicate these cases but do not bar a claim. A patient with multiple conditions is not entitled to a lesser standard of diagnostic care. The analysis simply has to account for what a reasonably competent physician would have identified even in the context of a complex clinical picture. Defendants frequently argue that pre-existing conditions explain the outcome, which is why thorough expert support on causation is so important.

What if multiple doctors were involved in the misdiagnosis?

Multiple providers can share liability when each contributed to a diagnostic failure at different stages of care. A primary care physician who failed to refer appropriately, a specialist who failed to order the right test, and a radiologist who misread the resulting study could all be named as defendants if each deviation from the standard of care contributed to the patient’s harm. Sorting out how liability is allocated across multiple providers is one of the more complex dimensions of these cases.

What is the continuous treatment doctrine and why does it matter for my deadline?

New York’s continuous treatment doctrine allows the statute of limitations to run from the end of continuous treatment for the same condition, rather than from the date of the original negligent act. This is significant in misdiagnosis cases because patients often remain under the care of the same provider who made the error, and the doctrine can preserve claims that might otherwise appear time-barred. Applying it correctly requires careful analysis of the treatment timeline, which is one reason early legal consultation matters.

Can a hospital be held responsible even if an independent physician made the error?

It depends on the relationship between the hospital and the physician. Hospitals may be directly liable for their own institutional failures, such as inadequate protocols or systemic failures in communication. They may also be vicariously liable for employees. When physicians are independent contractors rather than employees, hospital liability is more limited, though courts have recognized exceptions where the patient reasonably believed the hospital was providing care and was not aware that the physician was independent. This is a fact-specific analysis that varies by case.

Is there a difference between emergency room misdiagnosis and outpatient misdiagnosis claims?

The legal standard, a departure from accepted medical practice, applies in both settings. However, emergency room care is evaluated in the context of the acute, high-volume, and time-pressured environment in which it occurs. That context shapes what a reasonably competent emergency physician would do. Outpatient diagnosis errors are evaluated against the standard for the relevant specialty in a non-emergency setting. Both types of claims are viable, but the medical expert testimony supporting each will be drawn from different clinical contexts.

What if the misdiagnosis led to unnecessary surgery or harmful treatment?

This is a recognized category of misdiagnosis harm. If a patient undergoes chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, or other invasive treatment for a condition they did not actually have, the physical consequences of that treatment are compensable as damages caused by the diagnostic error. These claims can be substantial because the harm includes not only the suffering from unnecessary treatment but also any damage to organ systems or future health caused by that treatment.

How long do these cases typically take to resolve?

Medical malpractice cases in New York generally take longer to resolve than many other personal injury matters. Expert discovery, depositions of treating providers and retained experts, and the complexity of the underlying medical issues all extend timelines. Cases that go through the full litigation process in Nassau or Suffolk County Supreme Court may take several years from filing to resolution. Some matters settle before trial, but preparation for trial is what drives reasonable settlement outcomes. Realistic expectations about timeline are part of any honest conversation at the start of this process.

Misdiagnosis Attorney Serving Long Island Communities

Mark David Shirian P.C. serves clients across Long Island, including communities throughout Nassau County such as Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Freeport, Valley Stream, Rockville Centre, Baldwin, Oceanside, New Hyde Park, and Lynbrook. We also represent clients from across Suffolk County, including Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Brentwood, Central Islip, Patchogue, Ronkonkoma, Copiague, Amityville, Bay Shore, and Port Jefferson. From the South Shore communities through the North Shore neighborhoods and into the eastern reaches of the Island, our firm is accessible to Long Island residents who need serious legal representation after a medical failure. We also continue to serve clients throughout New York City, including Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, Manhattan, and Staten Island, making geographic proximity to any corner of the greater metropolitan area a non-issue for clients who need to reach our team.

Speak with a Long Island Misdiagnosis Attorney About Your Case

When a diagnostic failure has changed the course of your health or taken someone you love, the path forward requires clear information and honest assessment of your options. A Long Island misdiagnosis attorney at Mark David Shirian P.C. will evaluate what happened, what evidence exists, and what a claim could realistically accomplish for you. The firm’s approach is straightforward: assess the situation carefully, understand your goals, and pursue the best available outcome with the preparation and commitment your case requires. Contact Mark David Shirian P.C. today for a confidential case evaluation and let our team provide the direct, substantive guidance you need to decide how to move forward.

Dedicated To the satisfaction of our clients
He worked very hard to get the outcome that we both were looking for.

“In March of 2017, I had a wrongful job termination that distressed me… Read More

Mark pays close attention to details that are important for your case. I recommend him.

“An amazing attorney goes above and beyond for his clients. Mark pays close… Read More

Very compassionate and hard-working lawyer.

“Very compassionate and hard-working lawyer, fights hard for me and keeps me informed,… Read More

* Required Field

By submitting this form I acknowledge that contacting Mark David Shirian P.C. through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege. Furthermore, by submitting this form, I agree to be contacted about my request & other information using automated technology. (Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel.)
Acceptable Use Policy

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms