Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
 
Mark David Shirian PC: Bronx College Hazing Lawyer
Assertively Fighting for the Rights of Our Clients
New York City Personal Injury Lawyer / Bronx College Hazing Lawyer

Bronx College Hazing Lawyer

The person who gets hurt in a hazing incident is often the one the school and the organization claim “agreed” to it, and that single word shapes almost every fight over these cases. Mark David Shirian P.C. represents injured students and their families in New York hazing and personal injury matters, and a Bronx college hazing lawyer has to be ready to answer the consent argument from the first day, because New York law and the federal definition of hazing both treat a student’s willingness to participate as beside the point. The firm serves clients in the Bronx and across New York City, Westchester, Nassau, Long Island, and the greater New York region.

Hazing injuries in a Bronx college setting tend to come from the same few situations: forced drinking at a pledge event, physical “tests” and exercise rituals, sleep and food deprivation, and the quiet pressure on a new athletic team member who is told to go along or lose a spot. The Bronx is home to a mix of public and private colleges, and who owns the campus, who runs the organization, and who supervised the night in question determine where a case is filed, which deadlines apply, and who can be held responsible. Those questions should be sorted out early, because some of the clocks are far shorter than the ones people expect.

Families often arrive after a hospitalization, a withdrawn semester, or a child who will not talk about what happened. What they need first is a clear picture of what the law actually says, what evidence disappears quickly, and what a realistic path to accountability looks like. The sections below walk through that picture.

Colleges and Universities in the Bronx

The Bronx’s private colleges include Fordham University’s Rose Hill campus, with Division I athletics, club sports, and a wide range of student organizations, and Manhattan University in Riverdale, formerly Manhattan College, which also fields Division I teams. The College of Mount Saint Vincent in Riverdale and Monroe University, centered near Fordham Road, add more students, teams, and clubs. Claims involving a private college, along with claims against individual students, organizations, and property owners, are generally brought in the Supreme Court, Bronx County.

The borough’s public campuses include three CUNY schools, Lehman College in Bedford Park, Bronx Community College in University Heights, and Hostos Community College in the South Bronx, as well as SUNY Maritime College at Fort Schuyler in Throggs Neck. Maritime’s regimental cadet program is a military-style structure, a setting where rank and tradition can create the same pressures that drive hazing in fraternities and teams. Damages claims against CUNY and State-operated SUNY campuses belong in the Court of Claims and require a notice of claim on a short deadline, so an injury tied to a public campus needs attention right away.

How New York Defines Hazing, and Why Consent Does Not End the Case

New York addresses hazing in two tiers within Article 120 of the Penal Law. Hazing in the first degree is a class A misdemeanor. It applies when, during someone’s initiation into or affiliation with any organization, a person intentionally or recklessly engages in conduct that creates a substantial risk of physical injury and that conduct actually causes injury. Hazing in the second degree is a violation, and it requires no injury at all, only conduct that creates that substantial risk. A 2018 amendment clarified that the conduct includes making physical contact with a person or requiring physical activity of them, which brought forced exercise, beatings, and endurance rituals squarely within the statute.

A criminal charge is not required for a civil case, and a civil claim does not depend on a prosecutor’s decision. The injured student’s lawsuit rests on negligence and, in some cases, intentional wrongdoing, and the criminal hazing statutes help show what conduct society treats as unacceptable. The federal Stop Campus Hazing Act uses a definition that covers acts connected to initiation, affiliation, or maintaining membership in a student organization, and it states that it applies regardless of whether the person was willing to participate. Colleges must also publish transparency reports identifying organizations found responsible for hazing, along with the violations, sanctions, and investigation dates. Those reports can be useful evidence of what a school knew about a particular group.

On the civil side, New York follows pure comparative fault for non-vehicle injury claims. If a jury assigns some share of blame to the injured student, the damages are reduced by that share rather than eliminated. For a hazing victim, that means the “he went along with it” defense can at most shave a percentage, and the realities of group pressure, power imbalance, and intoxication are exactly what a well-prepared case puts in front of a jury.

Why Choose Mark David Shirian P.C. for a Bronx Hazing Injury Case

Mark David Shirian P.C. is a New York trial firm that serves clients in the Bronx, Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Westchester County, Nassau County, Long Island, and the wider region, and accepts matters from Suffolk and Rockland Counties as well. The firm leads with litigation and concentrates in personal injury, employment law, sports and entertainment law, and civil and commercial litigation. Hazing cases draw on all of that: they are injury cases, they often involve athletic programs and student organizations, and they frequently put a school or institution on the other side.

Mark D. Shirian, the firm’s Founding Member, leads the litigation practice. He has obtained multiple seven-figure settlements and has challenged Fortune 500 companies, school systems, and government entities, which matters when the defendant is a college with institutional counsel. He was named one of The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40, displays the NAOPIA Top 10 Attorney Award, and is a member of the American Association for Justice, the New York State Trial Lawyers Association, the New York State Academy of Trial Lawyers, and the Sports Lawyers Association. He is admitted in New York and in the U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, holds a B.A. from NYU and a J.D. from New York Law School, and has been featured in media including NBC, ABC, Fox News, The New York Times, The New York Post, and Daily News.

Shawn D. Shirian, Senior Associate, has more than seven years of litigation experience, including jury trials and dispositive motions, and has defended major corporate clients in premises liability and motor vehicle cases. That defense-side background is useful when anticipating how an institution will frame a hazing claim. He is admitted in New York and in the Eastern and Southern Districts, and holds a J.D. from New York Law School.

The firm’s results include a $1,500,000 Child Victims Act settlement, a $1,000,000 wrongful death settlement, a $500,000 daycare injury settlement for a minor, and $1,000,000 and $600,000 sexual harassment settlements, all matters involving institutions, vulnerable victims, and contested accountability. Clients describe the firm’s attention to detail, honest and direct communication, responsiveness, and a sense of being treated like family, and Google shows an Excellent rating based on 96 reviews. Every case is handled by one of the firm’s attorneys rather than a case manager, evaluations are free and confidential, and personal injury cases are handled on a contingency basis, so there is no fee unless there is a recovery.

Situations That Lead to Bronx College Hazing Claims

  • Alcohol-Based Initiation Events: Forced drinking, drinking games with a required pace, and “big brother” bottle rituals can cause alcohol poisoning, falls, and aspiration injuries. Organizers who supplied the alcohol or pressured pledges to finish it may face civil liability, along with others who ignored a visibly impaired student.
  • Athletic Team Rituals: Rookie initiations on college teams can involve forced consumption, humiliation, and physical challenges. A coach or athletic department that knew about a tradition and did nothing may share responsibility, and the Sports Lawyers Association background of the firm’s lead attorney is relevant to how team structures work.
  • Physical Beatings and Forced Exertion: Paddling, striking, and extreme exercise carry a substantial risk of injury, which is the exact conduct New York’s hazing statutes describe. Rhabdomyolysis, fractures, and head injuries are among the harms that can result.
  • Sleep, Food, and Water Deprivation: Weeks of required late-night activities can cause collapse, car crashes on the way home, and serious medical events. These cases often turn on messages and schedules showing what was demanded of new members.
  • Forced Confinement and Isolation: Locking pledges in rooms, vehicles, or remote locations creates risks of exposure and panic injuries, and may support claims beyond ordinary negligence.
  • Sexualized or Humiliating Acts: Coerced degrading conduct can support civil claims for emotional and physical harm, and where a student’s school or organization failed to respond to complaints, institutional liability may be at issue.
  • Wrongful Death After a Hazing Event: When a pledge dies, the claim belongs to the estate, and the notice and filing clocks run from the appointment of an estate representative in some circumstances. Families should speak with counsel before those timelines become a problem.
  • Off-Campus Chapter and Club Events: Many incidents happen at apartments, rented venues, and private properties. Landlords, venue owners, national organizations, and individual members can all be potential defendants depending on who controlled the setting.

What to Do in the Days and Weeks After a Hazing Injury

The first priority is medical care, and it should be documented completely. A student who hides the cause of an injury from an emergency room may later face a gap between the treatment record and the real story, so telling providers what actually happened, even if the student is embarrassed or afraid of consequences, creates a record that supports the case. Follow-up visits, counseling, and any lost semester time should be recorded as well.

Evidence in hazing cases lives on phones, and it can vanish quickly. Group chats, social media posts, photos, videos, and calendar invitations should be preserved by screenshot and left in place, not deleted or edited. A student should not confront the organization, reply to its members, or sign anything from the school or the group without speaking with a lawyer. Statements given to a campus conduct office can be used later, and an informal apology or “everyone was fine with it” message can be quoted back in litigation.

Deadlines depend on who the defendant is. For ordinary negligence claims against private parties, New York allows three years, while intentional torts such as assault carry a one-year period. A person who was under 18 when injured generally gets three years after turning 18, though that extension is capped for most injury claims at 10 years from when the claim arose, and it does not always carry over to claims against public bodies. A claim is only timely once a summons and complaint is filed with the court clerk; a demand letter or insurance notice does not stop the clock.

If the college is a public institution, additional steps apply. Tort claims against public corporations generally require a written notice of claim, sworn to, served within 90 days of when the claim arose, describing the claimant, the nature of the claim, when, where, and how it happened, and the damages. Late notice may sometimes be allowed by a court, but never beyond the limitations period, which for most municipal tort claims is one year and 90 days. The Court of Claims is the exclusive forum for damages claims against the State of New York and certain related entities, including the City University of New York, and it has no authority over individual defendants or city, county, or town governments. A hazing case may therefore be split between forums, with claims against the institution in one court and claims against individual members or the organization in another.

Most private-defendant injury suits over $50,000 in the Bronx are brought in the Supreme Court, Bronx County, Civil Term, in the Bronx, with appeals going to the Appellate Division, First Department. Federal claims, where they exist, may land in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, which covers the Bronx. Reporting to campus authorities and, where appropriate, the police is a separate decision from filing a lawsuit, and a lawyer can help weigh the timing so that neither undermines the other.

Who Can Be Held Responsible Beyond the Students Involved

Many families assume the only targets are the upperclassmen who ran the event. In practice, responsibility can reach further. A national fraternity, sorority, or sports governing body may have rules it failed to enforce. A college may have received earlier complaints, listed the organization in its hazing transparency reporting, or allowed the group to operate after prior violations. A landlord or venue operator may have rented space knowing what the gathering was. Each of these theories depends on what that party knew, what it controlled, and what it did about the risk.

Mark D. Shirian’s history of challenging school systems and government entities is relevant here, because institutional defendants rarely concede notice. Building the case usually means collecting prior incident reports, disciplinary records, communications between administrators and student leaders, and the rules the institution itself adopted. Public colleges in New York operate under written public order rules required by the Education Law, and CUNY’s are known as the Henderson Rules. A school’s failure to follow its own rules is often persuasive evidence of negligence.

Common Questions About Bronx College Hazing Cases

Is hazing a crime in New York?

Yes. Hazing in the first degree is a class A misdemeanor and applies when risky conduct during initiation actually causes injury. Hazing in the second degree is a violation and applies when the conduct creates a substantial risk of injury, even if no one is hurt. A civil lawsuit can proceed whether or not anyone is prosecuted.

Does it matter that I agreed to take part?

Much less than defendants hope. The federal Stop Campus Hazing Act definition applies regardless of whether a person was willing to participate, and New York’s comparative fault rule only reduces damages by whatever share of blame a jury assigns to you. It does not bar recovery for hazing injuries.

How long do I have to file a hazing lawsuit?

For negligence against private parties the period is three years, and for intentional torts like assault it is one year. People injured as minors generally have until three years after their 18th birthday, subject to a 10-year cap for most injury claims. Public defendants bring a separate 90-day notice of claim requirement, so speak with a lawyer as early as possible.

Can I sue the college itself?

Often, yes, if the school knew or should have known about the risk, ignored warning signs, or failed to enforce its own anti-hazing rules. The type of college affects the procedure: claims against CUNY go to the Court of Claims, while private colleges are generally sued in the Supreme Court.

What if the hazing happened off campus?

Off-campus events are common and do not end the case. Claims may run against the organization, its national body, individual members, and property owners or venue operators, and the college may still be involved if the group was recognized or the school had earlier notice of the conduct.

Will I get in trouble with my school for coming forward?

Schools sometimes discipline participants, which is one reason to talk with a lawyer before giving a statement. A lawyer can help you decide how to report while limiting the risk that your words are used against you.

What if my child died after a hazing event?

A wrongful death claim can be brought by the personal representative of the estate. For claims against public bodies, the 90-day notice period in wrongful death actions runs from the appointment of that representative, so opening the estate promptly matters. The firm has resolved a $1,000,000 wrongful death matter.

Does a hazing victim have to pay anything upfront?

No. Evaluations are free and confidential, and personal injury cases are handled on a contingency basis, meaning no fee unless there is a recovery.

Should I delete embarrassing messages or photos?

No. Deleting evidence can damage your credibility and may expose you to sanctions. Preserve everything, including content you find uncomfortable, and let your lawyer decide what is relevant.

Can a hazing case be filed if I am afraid of retaliation by teammates or members?

Fear of retaliation is common and a lawyer can handle communications so that you do not have to confront anyone. The attorneys at the firm, not a case manager, handle each case and keep clients informed, which clients have singled out in their reviews.

How are damages valued in a hazing case?

They typically reflect medical care, future treatment, lost educational and earning opportunity, and pain, suffering, and psychological harm. Where a death is involved, the estate may seek losses suffered by surviving family. Values depend on the evidence, the severity of injury, and who is held responsible.

Representing Hazing and Injury Clients Across the Bronx and the Region

The firm represents students and families throughout the Bronx, from the Fordham and Belmont areas through Kingsbridge, Riverdale, Norwood, Morris Heights, Mott Haven, Highbridge, Soundview, Throggs Neck, Pelham Bay, Parkchester, Co-op City, and Hunts Point. Clients also come from neighboring Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Queens, as well as Westchester County communities including Yonkers, Mount Vernon, New Rochelle, and White Plains. On Long Island, the firm serves families in Nassau County, including Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, and Great Neck, and accepts matters from Suffolk and Rockland Counties and other parts of the greater New York region. Many hazing cases involve students who live in one county and attend school in another, and the firm handles those cases wherever the college, chapter, or team is located.

Speak With a Bronx College Hazing Attorney

If you or your child was hurt in a hazing incident, a conversation with a Bronx college hazing attorney can clarify which deadlines apply, which evidence to save, and who may be responsible. Mark David Shirian P.C. offers free, confidential case evaluations, and an attorney, not a case manager, will take your call. Contact the firm to discuss what happened and what comes next.

Dedicated To the satisfaction of our clients
He worked very hard to get the outcome that we both were looking for.

“In March of 2017, I had a wrongful job termination that distressed me… Read More”

Mark pays close attention to details that are important for your case. I recommend him.

“An amazing attorney goes above and beyond for his clients. Mark pays close… Read More”

Very compassionate and hard-working lawyer.

“Very compassionate and hard-working lawyer, fights hard for me and keeps me informed,… Read More”

* Required Field

By submitting this form I acknowledge that contacting Mark David Shirian P.C. through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege. Furthermore, by submitting this form, I agree to be contacted about my request & other information using automated technology. (Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel.)
Acceptable Use Policy

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms