Close Menu
 
Mark David Shirian PC: Queens Workplace Toxic Exposure Lawyer
Assertively Fighting for the Rights of Our Clients
New York City Personal Injury Lawyer / Queens Workplace Toxic Exposure Lawyer

Queens Workplace Toxic Exposure Lawyer

Toxic exposure at work does not announce itself with obvious warning signs. It often unfolds gradually, through years of breathing in silica dust at a construction site in Long Island City, handling chemical solvents in a Maspeth warehouse, or working near asbestos-containing materials during a renovation project in Jamaica. By the time a worker connects their respiratory illness, neurological symptoms, or cancer diagnosis to something they encountered on the job, significant time has passed and so have certain legal deadlines. That delay is one of the most damaging things that can happen to a toxic exposure claim, which is why understanding what you are dealing with, and acting on it, matters far more than most people realize.

Queens workplace toxic exposure lawyers handle a type of claim that sits at the intersection of occupational medicine, workers’ compensation law, and personal injury litigation. These cases are not straightforward. The science is contested, the responsible parties often point fingers at each other, and employers and their insurers have every incentive to argue that your condition came from somewhere other than the workplace. Getting this right requires attorneys who take the time to understand your specific work history, the substances involved, and the legal routes available under New York law, because the path forward is rarely the same for any two workers.

Queens is home to an enormous range of industries, from food processing facilities and auto repair shops in Corona and Woodside to large-scale construction projects reshaping Long Island City and Flushing. The borough’s working population is diverse, often composed of workers who log long hours in industrial settings without full knowledge of what they are being exposed to or what their rights are when something goes wrong. Mark David Shirian P.C. represents workers across Queens who are navigating the serious, life-altering consequences of on-the-job toxic exposure.

Toxic Substances That Show Up Most Often in Queens Workplaces

  • Asbestos: Older commercial buildings throughout Queens, particularly in areas like Astoria, Jamaica, and Woodhaven, still contain asbestos in insulation, floor tiles, and pipe coverings. Workers involved in renovation, demolition, or maintenance of these structures face significant inhalation risk, and mesothelioma or asbestosis may not appear until decades after exposure.
  • Lead paint and lead dust: Construction workers, painters, and electricians working on pre-1978 structures in residential and commercial settings across the borough frequently encounter lead-based materials. Lead exposure is linked to neurological damage, kidney disease, and reproductive harm.
  • Industrial solvents and chemicals: Auto repair facilities, dry cleaners, printing shops, and manufacturing operations concentrated in areas like Maspeth, Ridgewood, and East Elmhurst use chemicals including benzene, toluene, and trichloroethylene, all of which carry serious long-term health risks with repeated exposure.
  • Silica dust: Workers cutting, grinding, or drilling concrete, brick, and stone, common activities on Queens construction sites, generate respirable crystalline silica. Prolonged inhalation causes silicosis, a progressive and incurable lung disease, and has been linked to lung cancer and kidney disease.
  • Pesticides and agricultural chemicals: Certain Queens workers in landscaping, pest control, and facility maintenance come into contact with pesticides that, over time, have been associated with Parkinson’s disease, certain cancers, and reproductive disorders.
  • Mold and biological hazards: Workers in building maintenance, water damage remediation, or older warehouse facilities may face ongoing mold exposure that leads to chronic respiratory conditions and immune system complications.
  • Diesel exhaust and vehicle emissions: Warehouse workers, delivery drivers, and employees at transportation facilities near JFK Airport and along the borough’s freight corridors may face chronic diesel particulate exposure, which carries recognized links to lung cancer and cardiovascular disease.

Why Mark David Shirian P.C. Handles These Claims Differently

Founded in 2016, Mark David Shirian P.C. built its practice around a commitment to fighting for people who have been wronged, whether by an employer, an insurance company, or another party whose negligence caused real harm. Attorneys Mark D. Shirian and Shawn D. Shirian bring a litigation-forward approach to every case they take on. The firm has recovered millions on behalf of its clients and operates with the kind of direct, one-on-one client attention that larger firms rarely provide.

What separates toxic exposure claims from other personal injury matters is their complexity. They require attorneys willing to dig into a client’s complete occupational history, understand the medical science behind the claimed condition, and identify every party who bears responsibility. That might be a direct employer, a building owner who failed to disclose hazardous conditions, a contractor who did not follow proper safety protocols, or a product manufacturer whose materials posed unreasonable risks. Client reviews highlight that the firm fights hard, pays close attention to detail, and keeps clients informed throughout. In toxic exposure cases, those qualities are not optional. They are what allows a case to survive scrutiny and reach a result that actually accounts for what the worker has lost.

If you are looking for a Queens workplace toxic exposure attorney who will treat your situation as the serious, fact-intensive claim that it is, this firm offers a confidential case evaluation to get started.

What to Do After Discovering a Possible Workplace Toxic Exposure in Queens

The first thing to understand is that you do not need a confirmed diagnosis to begin taking protective steps. If you have developed unexplained symptoms and have reason to believe your workplace may be responsible, start documenting everything now. Write down the substances you have worked with, how often, in what conditions, and for how long. Note whether personal protective equipment was provided and whether you received any safety training or material safety data sheets. All of this becomes important later.

Seek medical care from a physician who has experience with occupational diseases. Not every doctor is trained to make the connection between environmental exposure and specific conditions. In Queens and the broader New York City area, occupational medicine specialists and clinics exist that specifically evaluate work-related illnesses. Getting a proper evaluation creates a medical record that ties your condition to your workplace, which is foundational to any legal claim.

In New York, workers’ compensation claims for occupational disease must generally be filed within two years of when you knew or should have known that your condition was related to your work. This is called the discovery rule, and courts examine it closely. Missing this window can eliminate your ability to recover workers’ compensation benefits regardless of how serious your condition is. There is also a separate question of whether a third-party personal injury lawsuit is available, which operates on different timelines under New York’s statute of limitations for personal injury claims.

Report the condition to your employer in writing. New York law protects workers from retaliation for making workers’ compensation claims, but you should document every communication. Workers’ compensation claims go through the New York State Workers’ Compensation Board, which has a district office in Queens located at 168-46 91st Avenue in Jamaica. Hearings are scheduled through that office, and decisions can be appealed within the Board system and, if necessary, to the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court. Understanding this process matters because the Board proceedings are often adversarial, with the employer’s insurance carrier pushing back on claims from the start.

One of the most common mistakes workers make is assuming that filing a workers’ compensation claim is their only option. Depending on the source of the exposure, you may have claims against third parties, such as manufacturers of defective protective equipment, landlords of industrial buildings who concealed known hazards, or contractors who created the exposure. A workplace toxic exposure attorney in Queens can help you identify whether those additional routes exist and how they interact with any workers’ compensation benefits you receive.

How New York Law Approaches Occupational Toxic Exposure Claims

New York recognizes occupational diseases as compensable under its workers’ compensation framework when the disease arises naturally and directly from the employment and is not an ordinary disease of life to which the general public is equally exposed. This distinction matters because employers and insurers frequently argue that conditions like cancer, lung disease, or neurological disorders are not occupationally caused. Successfully countering that argument requires medical evidence, industrial hygiene data, and, in some cases, expert testimony about the specific exposure history and the biological mechanism connecting it to the diagnosed condition.

Beyond workers’ compensation, New York personal injury law allows workers to pursue third-party defendants whose negligence contributed to the exposure. These cases can result in compensation for pain and suffering, lost future earnings, and costs of ongoing medical care, categories of damages that workers’ compensation does not cover. In cases involving asbestos, for instance, New York courts have handled these claims for decades, and there are well-established procedures for asbestos litigation in New York Supreme Court, including in Queens County. The courthouse handling civil litigation in Queens is located at 88-11 Sutphin Boulevard in Jamaica.

It is also worth knowing that New York has specific protections under the Labor Law that apply to certain construction workers, and violations of those protections can create additional avenues for recovery when a worker is harmed by hazardous materials on a job site. Whether those provisions apply depends on the specific facts of the work being performed and who controlled the site. This is not a determination that can be made without looking closely at the employment relationship and the nature of the work.

Answers to Questions Workers in Queens Are Asking About Toxic Exposure Claims

How do I know if my illness is actually connected to my job?

The connection between a workplace substance and a medical condition is established through a combination of your occupational history, the known properties of the substances you were exposed to, and medical evaluation. An occupational medicine physician can help assess whether the pattern of your illness, its timing relative to your exposure, and the known effects of specific chemicals support a causal connection. This is usually documented through medical reports that become part of your workers’ compensation or legal claim.

Can I sue my employer directly for toxic exposure in New York?

In most cases, the workers’ compensation system is the exclusive remedy against a direct employer in New York, which means you generally cannot bring a traditional personal injury lawsuit against the company that employs you. However, this does not prevent lawsuits against other responsible parties, such as contractors, building owners, equipment manufacturers, or suppliers of hazardous materials. Identifying those third parties is one of the most important steps in building a complete toxic exposure claim.

What if I was exposed over many years at multiple jobs?

Multi-employer exposure is one of the more complex scenarios in toxic exposure litigation. Under New York workers’ compensation law, liability may be apportioned among multiple employers or their insurance carriers depending on when and where the exposure occurred. For third-party claims, the contribution of each defendant may also be at issue. Working through the exposure history carefully, with records from each employer if possible, is essential to presenting a coherent claim.

My employer says the substance I was exposed to is safe. How do I challenge that?

Employers and insurers often rely on their own industrial hygiene assessments or argue that exposure levels were within regulatory limits. Regulatory limits are not the same as safe limits, and scientific understanding of many substances has evolved significantly. Independent medical experts and industrial hygienists can review your specific workplace conditions, the duration and intensity of your exposure, and the relevant scientific literature to offer a counter-analysis. These experts are often central to winning contested toxic exposure claims.

Does workers’ compensation cover all of my medical treatment for an occupational disease?

Workers’ compensation in New York covers authorized medical treatment related to the work-related condition, as well as a portion of lost wages during recovery. However, treatment must generally be provided by an authorized provider within the workers’ compensation system, and disputes over what treatment is necessary or related to the work injury are common. Conditions that require ongoing or long-term treatment, such as occupational cancers or progressive lung diseases, often involve repeated disputes about coverage as new treatment needs arise.

What if my symptoms started years after I left the job where I was exposed?

This is very common with occupational diseases. Asbestos-related cancers, for example, have latency periods that can span decades. New York’s discovery rule for occupational disease claims attempts to account for this by starting the limitations clock when you knew or should have known that your illness was work-related. The precise moment that clock starts can be disputed, and courts have examined questions like when a diagnosis was received versus when a worker first suspected a connection. Acting promptly after any diagnosis is critical, even if the exposure occurred long ago.

Can I be fired for filing a workers’ compensation claim related to toxic exposure?

New York law prohibits employers from retaliating against workers for filing workers’ compensation claims. If you are terminated, demoted, have your hours reduced, or face other adverse action after reporting an exposure or filing a claim, you may have a separate retaliation claim in addition to your underlying workers’ compensation and personal injury claims. Document any adverse employment actions and their timing relative to your claim carefully.

Are there government agencies that investigate workplace toxic exposure in Queens?

Several agencies have jurisdiction over workplace safety in New York. The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) covers most private employers and has a regional office that handles complaints from New York City workers. The New York State Department of Labor also has oversight responsibilities, and the New York City Department of Health may be involved in cases involving environmental hazards that affect surrounding communities. Filing a complaint with OSHA can trigger an investigation and create a record of conditions at your workplace, though this process operates separately from your legal claim.

What if my employer never told me what chemicals I was working with?

Under federal and New York law, employers have obligations to disclose hazardous chemicals in the workplace through Material Safety Data Sheets (now called Safety Data Sheets) and training programs under OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard. A failure to provide this information is itself a violation of law and may be relevant to your claim. Your attorney can subpoena records about what substances were present on the worksite and what, if anything, your employer disclosed to workers about their risks.

Is there any compensation available if a toxic exposure in Queens led to a family member’s death?

If a worker dies as a result of an occupational disease caused by toxic exposure, surviving dependents may be eligible for death benefits under New York workers’ compensation. Additionally, if third-party liability exists, a wrongful death claim may be brought on behalf of the estate under New York’s wrongful death statute. These claims have specific filing requirements and timelines that differ from those governing a personal injury claim brought by the worker directly.

Queens Workplace Toxic Exposure Representation Across the Borough and Beyond

Mark David Shirian P.C. represents workers from across Queens, including those in Astoria, Long Island City, Sunnyside, Woodside, Jackson Heights, Elmhurst, Corona, Forest Hills, Rego Park, Kew Gardens, Richmond Hill, Jamaica, St. Albans, Springfield Gardens, Hollis, Queens Village, Bayside, Flushing, Whitestone, College Point, Fresh Meadows, Howard Beach, and Ozone Park. Workers from Maspeth, Ridgewood, Middle Village, Glendale, Woodhaven, and East Elmhurst have also brought claims that the firm has handled with the same direct, detail-oriented approach.

Beyond Queens, the firm extends its representation to workers throughout New York City, including those in Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island, as well as workers in Nassau County and other parts of New York State whose claims arise from occupational disease. Wherever a worker in the greater New York area has been harmed by toxic exposure on the job, the firm evaluates those cases with the same thoroughness and commitment.

Talk to a Queens Workplace Toxic Exposure Attorney About What Happened to You

A Queens workplace toxic exposure attorney at Mark David Shirian P.C. can review your situation, explain what claims may be available to you, and help you understand the deadlines that apply before they pass. Whether your exposure involved asbestos, lead, industrial solvents, silica, or another substance encountered on the job, the firm approaches each case with the attention it deserves. Workers in Queens deserve representation that takes their occupation history seriously and fights to ensure they are not left to absorb the medical and financial consequences of someone else’s failure to protect them.

Contact Mark David Shirian P.C. today to schedule a confidential case evaluation with a Queens workplace toxic exposure attorney who will give your case the focus it requires from the start.

Dedicated To the satisfaction of our clients
He worked very hard to get the outcome that we both were looking for.

“In March of 2017, I had a wrongful job termination that distressed me… Read More

Mark pays close attention to details that are important for your case. I recommend him.

“An amazing attorney goes above and beyond for his clients. Mark pays close… Read More

Very compassionate and hard-working lawyer.

“Very compassionate and hard-working lawyer, fights hard for me and keeps me informed,… Read More

* Required Field

By submitting this form I acknowledge that contacting Mark David Shirian P.C. through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege. Furthermore, by submitting this form, I agree to be contacted about my request & other information using automated technology. (Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel.)
Acceptable Use Policy

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms