Close Menu
 
Mark David Shirian PC: Brooklyn MTA Worker Injury Lawyer
Assertively Fighting for the Rights of Our Clients
New York City Personal Injury Lawyer / Brooklyn MTA Worker Injury Lawyer

Brooklyn MTA Worker Injury Lawyer

Working for New York City Transit or the Metropolitan Transportation Authority means showing up every day to keep one of the most complex transit systems in the world moving. It also means working around third rails, heavy equipment, moving trains, and conditions that can turn dangerous without warning. When something goes wrong on the job, the injuries are rarely minor. A Brooklyn MTA worker injury lawyer who understands the layered legal framework governing these claims can make the difference between recovering what you are actually owed and walking away with far less than your situation demands.

MTA workers occupy an unusual legal position. Depending on your role, your injury, and how it happened, you may have claims under federal railroad law, New York State workers’ compensation statutes, or both. Track workers, subway maintenance crews, bus operators, conductors, station agents, and signal technicians each face distinct hazards and fall under rules that most general practitioners rarely encounter. The Federal Employers’ Liability Act, commonly known as FELA, applies to workers on the Long Island Rail Road and Metro-North Railroad under the MTA umbrella. New York City Transit workers and other MTA subagencies may be covered under different frameworks. Getting the right claim filed in the right forum from the start is not a formality; it determines what you can recover and how much.

Brooklyn is home to a significant portion of the MTA’s operational workforce, from Coney Island yard workers to bus depot employees at the Jackie Gleason depot in Sunset Park to track crews working the B, D, N, Q, R, and F lines. The physical demands and environmental hazards these workers face daily are real, and the legal rights that follow a serious injury deserve equally serious attention.

What Mark David Shirian P.C. Brings to MTA Injury Claims

Mark David Shirian P.C. was founded in 2016 with a direct purpose: to represent people who have been wronged and to pursue results on their behalf. Attorneys Mark D. Shirian and Shawn D. Shirian have built a practice centered on assertive advocacy and creative legal strategy, handling personal injury cases across New York City and New York State with millions recovered for clients. That track record matters here because MTA injury claims are not straightforward workers’ compensation filings. They require an attorney who approaches each case as its own problem to solve, not a form to fill out.

Clients who have worked with this firm describe responsive, attentive representation from attorneys who pay close attention to details that shape outcomes. For an MTA worker facing lost wages, long-term medical treatment, and the uncertainty of what comes next, that kind of attention is not a luxury. The firm handles cases with the thoroughness of a large litigation shop while keeping clients genuinely informed throughout. When you are up against the MTA’s legal department and their insurers, having an attorney who treats your case with real care and strategic focus matters from day one.

Types of Injuries and Claims Faced by Brooklyn MTA Workers

  • Track and right-of-way injuries: Workers performing track maintenance, inspection, or repair face exposure to electrified third rails, moving trains, and falls in confined or poorly lit tunnel environments below Brooklyn streets. These incidents often involve equipment failures or inadequate safety protocols that may support a claim beyond standard benefits.
  • Repetitive stress and occupational conditions: Bus operators at depots like Jackie Gleason, East New York, or Flatbush Avenue develop chronic back, shoulder, and wrist conditions from the daily physical demands of operating heavy vehicles. These occupational injuries can be harder to document but are fully compensable when properly supported.
  • Slip and fall accidents at stations and yards: Wet platforms, oil on depot floors, uneven surfaces in maintenance facilities, and inadequate lighting across Brooklyn’s subway stations create slip and fall hazards that injure workers every year. Station locations along the A, C, and G lines, as well as surface yards like Coney Island Complex, are common sites.
  • Equipment and machinery accidents: Track equipment, rail cars undergoing maintenance, and heavy machinery used in the Coney Island Yard and other Brooklyn facilities can cause crush injuries, amputations, and severe trauma when safety guards are removed, equipment malfunctions, or training is inadequate.
  • FELA claims for Long Island Rail Road workers: LIRR employees who work in Brooklyn or through Atlantic Terminal and other Brooklyn-area facilities may pursue claims under FELA rather than traditional workers’ compensation. FELA requires showing employer negligence but allows recovery for pain and suffering, which standard workers’ comp does not cover.
  • Assaults on bus operators and station agents: Transit workers in Brooklyn face elevated risks of assault by passengers. When the MTA fails to provide adequate security measures, training, or protective barriers that could have prevented an attack, the agency may bear liability beyond what a standard workplace injury claim addresses.
  • Toxic exposure and respiratory conditions: Workers in tunnel environments or maintenance facilities are exposed to diesel exhaust, asbestos in older subway infrastructure, and chemical cleaning agents. These exposures can cause long-term pulmonary and other health conditions that qualify as occupational diseases under applicable law.

After a Workplace Injury on the MTA: What You Need to Do

The first thing worth understanding is that the deadlines governing MTA injury claims are not uniform across all claim types, and missing them is usually irreversible. FELA claims carry a three-year statute of limitations from the date of injury, but waiting three years is not a strategy. Evidence degrades, witnesses move on, and the MTA’s own legal team begins building its file immediately. For notices of claim against New York City Transit or other municipal MTA agencies, separate notice requirements may apply, and these timelines can be significantly shorter. An MTA worker injury attorney in Brooklyn should be contacted as soon as possible after the incident.

Document everything you can, starting at the scene if you are physically able. Photographs of the location, the equipment involved, lighting conditions, any warning signs or the absence of them, and anything else that captured the state of the worksite at the time of the incident are all useful. If coworkers witnessed what happened, note their names before you leave. The MTA will conduct its own investigation, and you want your version of events documented independently and promptly.

Seek medical attention without delay, both because your health requires it and because a medical record that begins the same day as the injury is substantially more valuable than one that starts a week later after you tried to push through the pain. Be specific with treating physicians about how the injury occurred and which body parts are affected. Vague or incomplete medical records become ammunition for the MTA’s side at every stage of the claim.

You will also want to report the injury through official MTA channels, which is required under most applicable frameworks. Keep a copy of whatever report you file and note who received it. Do not assume the internal reporting process protects your legal rights. It does not substitute for the separate legal steps required to preserve a FELA or negligence claim.

Claims against the MTA are handled at several levels. Workers’ compensation matters in New York are administered through the Workers’ Compensation Board, and hearings may take place at the Board’s Brooklyn district office. FELA claims are federal causes of action that can be filed in either federal court or state court. The Supreme Court, Kings County, located at 360 Adams Street in downtown Brooklyn, handles state court litigation for Brooklyn-based cases. Your attorney will assess which forum serves your interests best depending on the facts of your situation.

The Difference Between FELA and Workers’ Compensation for MTA Employees

Understanding which legal framework applies to your claim is not a technicality. It determines the range of compensation available to you and how the case is built. New York City Transit subway and bus workers are generally covered under the New York State workers’ compensation system. That system provides wage replacement and medical benefits without requiring proof that the MTA did anything wrong, but it also caps what you can recover and does not allow recovery for pain and suffering.

LIRR and Metro-North workers operate under FELA, a federal statute that takes a different approach. Under FELA, you must show that employer negligence contributed to your injury, even in part. The standard is more favorable than ordinary negligence law because even slight negligence on the part of the railroad is enough to create liability. If you succeed, the recovery can be substantially broader, including compensation for pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and future lost earning capacity. The tradeoff is that the claim requires building an actual negligence case, which takes investigation, expert support, and litigation skill.

Some workers may have both a workers’ compensation claim and a third-party negligence claim arising from the same incident. If a contractor’s equipment caused the injury, if a defective product failed, or if a property owner’s negligence contributed to what happened, there may be additional responsible parties beyond the MTA itself. Identifying all potential sources of liability requires a careful factual investigation, not a form-filling exercise. A Brooklyn MTA worker injury attorney who handles these claims regularly will know where to look and what questions to ask before drawing any conclusions about the available theories.

One thing that catches many workers off guard is the concept of comparative fault. The MTA will frequently argue that the worker’s own actions contributed to the accident. Under FELA, comparative fault reduces but does not eliminate recovery, meaning even if you are found partially responsible, you may still be entitled to a meaningful recovery. Under the standard workers’ compensation framework, fault is largely irrelevant. Knowing how these principles interact with the specific facts of your situation is something only an attorney who has handled MTA injury claims can properly advise you on.

Questions Brooklyn MTA Workers Ask About Injury Claims

Can I be fired for filing an injury claim against the MTA?

Retaliation against workers who file workplace injury claims or FELA claims is prohibited under federal and state law. That said, workers should document everything carefully in case retaliatory conduct occurs in a more subtle form, such as shift reassignment, discipline for unrelated matters, or pressure to return to work before being medically cleared. If you experience any of that after filing a claim, report it to your attorney immediately.

What if my injury was partly my own fault?

Under FELA, comparative negligence reduces your recovery proportionally but does not bar it. If a jury finds you were 30 percent at fault, your recovery is reduced by 30 percent, not eliminated. Under the workers’ compensation framework, your own negligence generally does not reduce your benefits at all. The MTA will still attempt to minimize what you receive, and having legal representation affects whether those arguments succeed.

How long does an MTA injury case typically take to resolve?

There is no honest single answer. Workers’ compensation claims can move relatively quickly if the injury is well-documented and not disputed. FELA litigation in federal or state court can take anywhere from one to several years depending on the complexity of the case, the extent of the injuries, and whether the matter settles or goes to trial. Cases involving permanent disability or substantial lost earning capacity tend to take longer because the full extent of damages needs time to be properly documented and quantified.

Do I need a union to help me pursue my claim, or is a lawyer sufficient?

Your union may provide some initial guidance and has its own interests in how MTA-related injuries are handled, but the union does not represent your individual legal claim. A union representative is not a lawyer and cannot provide legal advice specific to your situation. Having your own attorney means someone is working exclusively for your recovery, not for the collective relationship between the union and the MTA.

What happens to my health benefits and pension if I am out of work due to an injury?

This depends on the length of your absence, your employment status, and the specific terms of your MTA employment agreement. Workers’ compensation wage replacement does not replicate your full salary. If your injury results in a long-term or permanent inability to return to your specific position, questions about disability retirement under the relevant pension system may arise. These are separate legal and administrative processes that intersect with your injury claim, and understanding how they interact requires careful coordination.

Can I sue the MTA directly for my injuries, or am I limited to workers’ compensation?

If you are an LIRR or Metro-North employee, your remedy is through FELA, which is a direct negligence claim against the railroad. If you are a New York City Transit employee, workers’ compensation is generally your primary remedy against the MTA itself. However, if a third party, such as a contractor, equipment manufacturer, or property owner, contributed to your injury, you may have a separate negligence claim against that party regardless of your workers’ compensation coverage.

Are occupational diseases treated differently from acute injuries in MTA claims?

Yes. A condition that develops gradually over time, such as a respiratory disease from tunnel exposure or hearing loss from prolonged noise, requires a different type of documentation and carries its own set of rules regarding when the statute of limitations begins to run. The clock typically starts from when you knew or should have known that the condition was work-related, not from the first day you felt symptoms. These cases require medical expert evidence linking the diagnosis to the specific work environment.

What if I was injured during training or before I was assigned to a permanent position?

Injuries during MTA training or probationary periods are still generally covered under the applicable workers’ compensation or FELA framework. Your employment status at the exact moment of injury matters, and the specifics of your MTA classification will determine exactly which benefits apply. Do not assume that being in a training role means you have no claim.

Can I return to a different position if I cannot go back to my original job after an injury?

Vocational rehabilitation and light-duty assignments are part of some MTA employment frameworks, but whether those options are available depends on your medical restrictions, your classification, and what the MTA is willing to offer. If the MTA terminates you or refuses reasonable accommodation while you are still capable of some form of work, that conduct may itself give rise to additional claims. Your attorney can assess whether the MTA’s return-to-work process is being handled appropriately in your case.

What should I avoid saying to MTA investigators or insurance representatives after an injury?

Avoid giving recorded statements, signing any documents, or making any representations about how the injury happened or how you are feeling until you have spoken with an attorney. MTA investigators and claims adjusters are trained to gather information in ways that can be used to minimize what the authority pays out. A polite but firm statement that you are consulting with legal counsel before making any statements is completely appropriate and protects your interests.

Representing MTA Workers Across Brooklyn and the Surrounding Boroughs

Mark David Shirian P.C. serves injured MTA workers throughout Brooklyn’s neighborhoods, from Bay Ridge and Bensonhurst along the R line corridor to Flatbush, Crown Heights, and Prospect Heights where the 2, 3, 4, and 5 trains run. Workers from Sunset Park, Red Hook, and Gowanus who work at the nearby Jackie Gleason bus depot or related facilities are welcome to reach out. The firm also represents clients from East New York, Brownsville, and Canarsie, where the L and J lines terminate and large transit employee populations live and work. Beyond Brooklyn, the firm extends its representation to transit and railroad workers in Queens, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Manhattan, including those employed at Atlantic Terminal, Long Island City yards, and the various LIRR stations that connect outer borough communities to the regional rail network. Workers in Nassau County who commute through LIRR facilities, as well as those in Westchester County along the Metro-North lines, may also have FELA-based claims that the firm can evaluate. From the elevated lines in Woodhaven to the underground tunnels beneath Downtown Brooklyn, the geographic reach of this firm’s personal injury representation matches the scale of the MTA network itself.

Speak with a Brooklyn MTA Worker Injury Attorney About Your Situation

Working for the MTA carries real risks, and a serious injury can affect your income, your health, and your long-term ability to do the job you were trained for. If you have been hurt on the job, speaking with a Brooklyn MTA worker injury attorney as soon as possible gives you the clearest picture of what you can actually recover and how to pursue it. Mark David Shirian P.C. offers confidential case evaluations so you can understand your options without any obligation. Call today to speak with attorneys Mark D. Shirian or Shawn D. Shirian directly about what happened and what comes next.

Dedicated To the satisfaction of our clients
He worked very hard to get the outcome that we both were looking for.

“In March of 2017, I had a wrongful job termination that distressed me… Read More

Mark pays close attention to details that are important for your case. I recommend him.

“An amazing attorney goes above and beyond for his clients. Mark pays close… Read More

Very compassionate and hard-working lawyer.

“Very compassionate and hard-working lawyer, fights hard for me and keeps me informed,… Read More

* Required Field

By submitting this form I acknowledge that contacting Mark David Shirian P.C. through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege. Furthermore, by submitting this form, I agree to be contacted about my request & other information using automated technology. (Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel.)
Acceptable Use Policy

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms