Close Menu
 
Mark David Shirian PC: Brooklyn MTA Bus Accident Lawyer
Assertively Fighting for the Rights of Our Clients
New York City Personal Injury Lawyer / Brooklyn MTA Bus Accident Lawyer

Brooklyn MTA Bus Accident Lawyer

Every day, MTA buses move hundreds of thousands of people across Brooklyn’s neighborhoods, from Flatbush and Crown Heights to Bay Ridge and Bushwick. That volume of daily service means accidents happen with real frequency, and the injuries that result from a bus collision, a sudden stop, or a fall inside a moving bus can be serious and lasting. If you were hurt on or near an MTA bus in Brooklyn, the path toward compensation runs through a legal process that is considerably more complicated than an ordinary car accident claim. A Brooklyn MTA bus accident lawyer who understands the specific rules governing transit authority claims is not a convenience; it is a practical necessity.

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority is a public benefit corporation operating under New York State law. That legal status creates procedural requirements that do not apply to accidents involving private vehicles or businesses. Miss a critical filing deadline or fail to serve the correct notice in the correct form, and a valid injury claim can be lost entirely regardless of how clear the evidence of negligence is. These are procedural traps that catch injured people who try to handle claims without counsel, and the MTA’s legal department is well-staffed and familiar with every one of them.

At Mark David Shirian P.C., attorneys Mark D. Shirian and Shawn D. Shirian represent people injured in accidents across New York City, including victims of transit-related incidents throughout Brooklyn. The firm approaches each case with the same combination of assertive advocacy and careful factual development that complex injury claims require.

What Causes MTA Bus Accidents in Brooklyn, and Who Pays

Brooklyn’s street grid was not designed for the volume or scale of bus traffic it now carries. Wide articulated buses navigate narrow residential streets in Bed-Stuy and Crown Heights. Routes along Flatbush Avenue, Atlantic Avenue, and Eastern Parkway deal with dense pedestrian activity, double-parked vehicles, and delivery trucks that reduce lane width. The B44, B46, and B41 are among the busiest surface bus routes in the entire MTA system, and their frequency means that any systemic issue, whether maintenance failures, driver fatigue, or route-specific hazards, tends to produce recurring incidents.

Bus accidents in Brooklyn fall into several different causal patterns. Driver error accounts for a significant share, including failure to yield, running red lights, improper left turns across traffic, and distracted operation. Mechanical failures, particularly brake system issues and tire blowouts, produce a distinct category of accidents where the MTA’s maintenance practices come under scrutiny. Then there are passenger injury cases where the bus never collides with anything but a driver’s abrupt braking or acceleration throws a standing passenger into a pole or down a stairwell. Each of these fact patterns carries different evidentiary demands.

On the liability side, the MTA is the principal defendant in most cases, but depending on how an accident occurred, other parties may share responsibility. A third-party driver who cut off a bus, a property owner whose poorly maintained driveway created a hazard, or a contractor responsible for a defective bus component can each become additional defendants. Identifying every source of liability early in the case matters because the MTA’s own exposure is capped by the nature of governmental tort law, and having additional defendants can affect the ultimate recovery.

Why Mark David Shirian P.C. Handles These Claims Differently

Mark David Shirian P.C. was founded with a specific purpose: to help people who have been wronged obtain real results. The firm has recovered millions of dollars on behalf of clients across New York City, and its reputation is built on attentive, one-on-one legal representation rather than the volume-processing model common to large personal injury practices. Clients who have worked with attorney Mark D. Shirian describe him as detail-oriented, communicative, and someone who genuinely fights for the outcome they need rather than the outcome that is easiest to obtain.

For MTA bus accident claims, those qualities translate into something concrete. These cases require early and aggressive evidence preservation. Bus surveillance footage, onboard event data recorders, dispatch logs, and driver personnel files can all be critical, and much of it disappears quickly if no one acts to preserve it. The firm’s approach of assessing each case carefully before mapping a strategy means that the specific evidence demands of a Brooklyn transit accident get addressed from the start, not after key materials have been overwritten or discarded. For someone facing medical bills, lost income, and an uncertain recovery, having counsel that moves with both care and purpose is the difference between a claim that gets resolved fairly and one that does not.

Injuries and Damages That Brooklyn Bus Accident Victims Commonly Face

  • Traumatic brain injuries: Sudden stops and collisions can throw passengers against hard surfaces inside the bus; even impacts that seem minor can produce concussions or more serious closed-head injuries that affect cognition, memory, and work capacity for months or years.
  • Spinal and cervical injuries: Whiplash is frequently dismissed early in a claim’s life but can develop into chronic pain and nerve damage requiring surgery; standing passengers thrown by abrupt braking face particularly high risk of spinal trauma.
  • Fractures from falls inside the bus: Elderly passengers and those with mobility limitations are disproportionately injured by in-vehicle falls; hip fractures in older adults carry serious medical consequences beyond the initial break.
  • Pedestrian impact injuries: Brooklyn pedestrians struck by MTA buses, particularly on routes with frequent stops on narrow streets like Nostrand Avenue or Church Avenue, often sustain severe lower-extremity injuries, pelvic fractures, and internal organ damage.
  • Soft tissue injuries that become chronic: Shoulder tears, knee ligament injuries, and muscle damage may not appear on initial imaging but develop into conditions requiring surgery and extended rehabilitation.
  • Psychological harm: Serious bus accidents produce post-traumatic stress, anxiety disorders, and depression that are compensable components of a personal injury claim and often go unaddressed in inadequate settlements.

What to Do After an MTA Bus Accident in Brooklyn

The single most important deadline in any MTA bus accident claim is the notice of claim requirement. Under New York law, a claimant must file a notice of claim with the MTA within 90 days of the date of the accident. This is a strict procedural prerequisite, and missing it can bar the claim entirely. The notice must contain specific information about the claimant’s identity, the nature of the claim, the date, location, and manner in which the incident occurred, and the injuries and damages alleged. Filing a defective notice can be as harmful as filing no notice at all.

After the notice of claim is filed, there is typically a 50-H examination, which is a sworn hearing at which the MTA has the right to question the claimant about the accident and injuries before any lawsuit is filed. This examination is consequential; what you say at a 50-H hearing becomes part of the record and can be used in subsequent litigation. Preparing for a 50-H hearing is one of the most important things an attorney does in an MTA case, and going into that examination without legal preparation is a significant risk.

In the immediate aftermath of an accident, several practical steps matter. If you can do so safely, document the scene with photographs, note the bus route number and bus identification number visible on the vehicle, and get the names and contact information of other passengers or bystanders who witnessed what happened. Seek medical evaluation promptly, even if injuries feel minor. A gap in medical treatment gives insurance adjusters and defense attorneys a basis to argue that injuries were not caused by the accident or were not serious.

MTA bus accident cases are litigated in New York State Supreme Court, Kings County, located at 360 Adams Street in Downtown Brooklyn. The courthouse’s Civil Term handles these matters, and the litigation process typically includes discovery, depositions, expert disclosure, and, in many cases, mediation before trial. Understanding the timeline and what to expect at each stage helps injured clients make informed decisions about settlement offers and trial strategy.

One common mistake is communicating directly with the MTA’s representatives or insurance adjusters without counsel. The MTA is a sophisticated institutional litigant. Any statement you make can be used to reduce or eliminate your recovery. Retaining a Brooklyn bus accident attorney before any such communication protects both the factual record and the legal value of your claim.

Questions Brooklyn Bus Accident Victims Ask

What is the deadline for filing a lawsuit against the MTA in New York?

The statute of limitations for a personal injury lawsuit against the MTA is one year and 90 days from the date of the accident. However, because the notice of claim must be filed within just 90 days of the accident, the practical deadline that governs your case is that earlier notice requirement. Missing the notice deadline effectively ends the claim regardless of the statute of limitations.

Can I sue the MTA if I was a passenger standing on the bus when the driver braked suddenly?

Yes. Passengers who are injured by sudden stops, acceleration, or sharp turns that are not caused by an emergency situation may have valid claims against the MTA based on the driver’s operation of the bus. The MTA owes passengers a high duty of care as a common carrier, meaning it must operate buses with the highest degree of care that human skill and foresight can provide. That standard is more demanding than the ordinary negligence standard that applies in most car accident cases.

What if the MTA bus hit my car at an intersection in Brooklyn? Do the same rules apply?

The notice of claim requirement applies to any claim against the MTA for property damage or personal injury, whether you were a bus passenger, a pedestrian, a cyclist, or the driver of another vehicle. If your car was struck by an MTA bus anywhere in Brooklyn, the same 90-day notice filing requirement governs your claim against the transit authority.

How does comparative negligence affect my MTA bus accident claim?

New York follows a pure comparative negligence rule, meaning your recovery is reduced proportionally by your share of fault but is not eliminated entirely. Even if you were found to be 30 percent at fault for an accident, you can still recover 70 percent of your total damages. In bus accident cases, the MTA and its defense team often argue that a passenger’s behavior, such as moving around the bus while it was in motion, contributed to their injuries. How that argument is presented and countered at trial or in settlement negotiations significantly affects the outcome.

Does the MTA have its own medical examiners, and do I have to attend one?

Yes. In MTA litigation, the authority typically demands an independent medical examination, or IME, conducted by a physician of its choosing. You are generally required to attend this examination. These examinations are not neutral; the doctors conducting them are often retained regularly by transit authorities and insurance carriers. Having counsel who knows how to prepare you for an IME and who can challenge an unfavorable IME report through expert testimony is important to the integrity of the medical portion of your case.

What evidence can the MTA be required to preserve and produce in my case?

MTA buses are equipped with surveillance cameras, event data recorders, and GPS tracking systems. Dispatch communications and driver logs are also maintained. Through litigation and proper preservation demands, injured claimants can obtain this material. Surveillance video is particularly subject to being overwritten if a litigation hold is not sent quickly. This is one reason early legal involvement is critical; an attorney can send a document preservation notice to the MTA shortly after the accident.

My injury got worse several months after the accident. Can I still include those damages in my claim?

Yes, provided your claim was properly initiated within the required timeframes. The damages in a personal injury case include future medical costs and future pain and suffering, not just expenses incurred before settlement or trial. Expert medical testimony typically supports these future damages claims. A condition that initially seemed manageable but has progressed, such as a spinal injury that ultimately required surgery, can substantially increase the value of a well-documented claim.

What if the MTA bus driver was operating the bus on a route they were not certified for, or had prior disciplinary issues?

This type of information goes to the MTA’s institutional negligence, sometimes called negligent entrustment or negligent supervision, separate from the individual driver’s conduct. If the MTA had reason to know that a driver posed a safety risk and deployed them anyway, that evidence can support a broader liability theory and affects both settlement leverage and trial strategy. Obtaining driver personnel records through discovery is a standard component of bus accident litigation.

Can I file a claim if I was hurt while boarding or exiting the bus?

Yes. Injuries that occur on bus steps, at the bus door, on a bus ramp for accessibility, or while a passenger is alighting onto the curb can support a claim against the MTA if negligence contributed to the fall or injury. These cases often involve questions about whether the driver closed the door prematurely, whether the steps were in proper condition, or whether the bus was positioned properly at the curb stop.

How long do MTA bus accident cases typically take to resolve in Brooklyn?

Cases that proceed through full litigation in Kings County Supreme Court can take two to four years from filing to trial or resolution, depending on court scheduling, the complexity of injuries, and whether the parties reach a settlement during the process. Many cases resolve before trial through negotiation or mediation, but the timeline still typically extends well beyond what claimants expect. Cases with clear liability and well-documented injuries often settle faster than contested liability cases.

Representing Brooklyn Bus Accident Clients Across Every Neighborhood

Mark David Shirian P.C. represents bus accident victims throughout Brooklyn and the broader New York City area. Our clients come from across the borough, including Flatbush, East Flatbush, Crown Heights, Bedford-Stuyvesant, Bushwick, Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Park Slope, Sunset Park, Bay Ridge, Bensonhurst, Borough Park, Canarsie, East New York, Brownsville, Prospect Heights, Carroll Gardens, Red Hook, Gowanus, and Sheepshead Bay. We also represent clients from neighborhoods in other boroughs who were injured on Brooklyn bus routes, including those traveling from Queens neighborhoods like Ridgewood, Jamaica, and Jackson Heights, as well as Manhattan residents who cross into Brooklyn for work or daily travel. Clients injured on MTA bus routes that pass through multiple boroughs receive the same attentive representation regardless of which part of the route the accident occurred on.

Bus accident cases in Brooklyn arise on major routes throughout the borough, and our firm understands the specific geography, traffic patterns, and road conditions that characterize the streets where these accidents occur. Whether the incident happened on a busy commercial corridor or a quieter residential street, the legal work required is the same: careful investigation, early evidence preservation, and determined advocacy through every stage of the claim.

Talk to a Brooklyn MTA Bus Accident Attorney About Your Claim

The 90-day notice deadline in MTA claims makes delay genuinely costly. The longer you wait to speak with a Brooklyn MTA bus accident attorney, the narrower the window for proper filing and evidence preservation becomes. At Mark David Shirian P.C., attorneys Mark D. Shirian and Shawn D. Shirian provide direct, one-on-one attention to each client. The firm’s track record of recovering millions for injured New Yorkers reflects a practice built on preparation and persistence, not shortcuts. Contact Mark David Shirian P.C. today for a confidential case evaluation and let an experienced Brooklyn bus accident attorney review the specific facts of your situation.

Dedicated To the satisfaction of our clients
He worked very hard to get the outcome that we both were looking for.

“In March of 2017, I had a wrongful job termination that distressed me… Read More

Mark pays close attention to details that are important for your case. I recommend him.

“An amazing attorney goes above and beyond for his clients. Mark pays close… Read More

Very compassionate and hard-working lawyer.

“Very compassionate and hard-working lawyer, fights hard for me and keeps me informed,… Read More

* Required Field

By submitting this form I acknowledge that contacting Mark David Shirian P.C. through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege. Furthermore, by submitting this form, I agree to be contacted about my request & other information using automated technology. (Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel.)
Acceptable Use Policy

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms