Close Menu
 
Mark David Shirian PC: New York City Traumatic Brain Injury Lawyer
Assertively Fighting for the Rights of Our Clients
New York City Personal Injury Lawyer / New York City Traumatic Brain Injury Lawyer

New York City Traumatic Brain Injury Lawyer

A traumatic brain injury does not announce itself with a simple diagnosis and a clear recovery timeline. It rewires lives. Cognitive function, emotional regulation, memory, speech, and the ability to work can all be altered permanently by an event that may have lasted only seconds. For many survivors across the five boroughs and surrounding areas, the hardest realization is not the injury itself but the gap between what insurance companies offer and what the actual cost of that injury will be over a lifetime. A New York City traumatic brain injury lawyer who understands the medicine, the economics, and the litigation required to close that gap is not a luxury at this stage. It is the difference between a settlement that runs out in three years and one that actually accounts for the rest of your life.

TBI cases are among the most aggressively defended personal injury claims in New York. Insurers routinely hire neuropsychologists to contest the severity of cognitive deficits, commission surveillance to undermine credibility, and argue that symptoms are pre-existing or psychiatric rather than injury-related. Winning requires more than documenting the accident. It requires building a case that connects the mechanism of injury to the specific neurological damage, demonstrates how that damage affects daily function and earning capacity, and withstands scrutiny from defense experts who are paid to minimize exactly what happened to you.

New York City generates TBI claims across a wide range of circumstances: construction sites operating under intense scheduling pressure, vehicles crowding intersections along the BQE and the FDR, pedestrians struck in crosswalks on Broadway and Atlantic Avenue, patients harmed during procedures at major hospital systems, and slip and fall incidents on poorly maintained commercial and residential property. Each of these settings carries its own liability framework, and the strategy required for a construction site fall differs substantially from what a motor vehicle TBI claim demands in discovery and expert preparation.

What TBI Claims Actually Demand from a Litigation Team

Mark David Shirian P.C. was founded in 2016 by Attorney Mark D. Shirian with a direct mission: to help those who have been wronged. The firm has recovered millions on behalf of clients across New York and approaches serious injury cases with the one-on-one attention that clients at boutique firms receive, combined with the resources and track record of a firm that has litigated high-stakes claims to successful conclusions. Attorney Shawn D. Shirian serves as Senior Associate, and the firm’s approach is built on four stated values: assertive, dependable, creative, and honest.

Those qualities are not abstract in the context of a TBI claim. Assertiveness means pressing defendants and their insurers before evidence disappears, before witnesses become unavailable, and before the defense has time to build a competing narrative. Dependability means that clients dealing with cognitive fatigue, emotional volatility, and the stress of ongoing medical treatment are not left chasing their attorney for updates. Creativity matters because TBI cases often require unconventional valuation approaches, including life care planning models, vocational rehabilitation assessments, and loss of enjoyment of life calculations that capture what a balance sheet cannot. Clients who have worked with the firm have described the attorneys as compassionate and hard-working, noting that they fight hard and keep clients informed throughout the process. For someone managing a brain injury whose very capacity to process information may be compromised, that kind of communication is not a courtesy. It is essential.

How Traumatic Brain Injuries Arise in New York City and Who May Be Liable

  • Construction Site Accidents: New York Labor Law provides specific protections for workers injured at elevation and from falling objects, and construction sites across Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Queens regularly generate TBI claims when scaffolding collapses, debris falls from heights, or workers are struck by equipment without adequate head protection or site supervision.
  • Motor Vehicle Collisions: Intersection crashes along corridors like Northern Boulevard, Flatbush Avenue, and the Grand Concourse, as well as highway incidents on the Staten Island Expressway and the Van Wyck, produce closed-head injuries that may not appear on initial imaging but manifest over weeks in cognitive and behavioral changes.
  • Pedestrian and Bicycle Accidents: New York City’s density of foot and cycling traffic means that delivery vehicles, turning cars, and bus incidents generate significant TBI exposure, particularly when cyclists are struck without adequate warning or pedestrians are hit in crosswalks that drivers fail to yield.
  • Premises Liability Falls: Property owners in New York have a duty to maintain safe conditions, and stairwells without adequate lighting, wet floors without warning signs, and broken sidewalk panels create fall scenarios where a single impact to the head results in injury that does not resolve in weeks or months.
  • Medical Malpractice: Surgical errors, anesthesia complications, delayed diagnosis of intracranial bleeding, and failures to monitor patients after head trauma in emergency settings can all cause or significantly worsen a traumatic brain injury, creating claims against hospitals, surgeons, and emergency medicine providers.
  • Assault and Negligent Security: When a building owner, event venue, or property manager fails to provide adequate security and a patron or tenant is assaulted, the resulting head trauma may support a negligent security claim alongside any criminal proceeding against the assailant.
  • Defective Products: Helmets that fail under impact forces they were designed to withstand, vehicle airbag systems that malfunction, and other consumer products can produce TBI liability against manufacturers under product liability theories that run parallel to or independent of other claims.

The Medical and Legal Timeline After a Brain Injury in New York

The period immediately following a traumatic brain injury is both the most critical medically and the most legally consequential. If you were injured in New York City and have not yet sought emergency evaluation, that step cannot wait. Hospitals including Bellevue, NYU Langone, Mount Sinai, NewYork-Presbyterian, and Kings County Hospital all have neurology and neurosurgery departments equipped to identify intracranial injuries that standard imaging may initially underrepresent. A CT scan can miss diffuse axonal injury, which requires MRI or DTI imaging to detect. If your initial emergency records do not capture the full extent of neurological damage, that gap will be used against you later in litigation.

New York’s statute of limitations for most personal injury claims is three years from the date of the injury, but this timeline has critical exceptions. Claims against a New York City agency or government entity require a notice of claim to be filed within 90 days of the incident, and the lawsuit itself must be commenced within one year and 90 days. Medical malpractice claims operate under a different limitations period entirely. Missing any of these deadlines generally bars recovery regardless of how serious the injury is, which is one reason why contacting a traumatic brain injury attorney in New York City early in the process is not just strategic but necessary.

Gathering evidence begins on day one and cannot be reconstructed months later. Surveillance footage from stores, transit systems, and building lobbies is routinely overwritten within 30 to 90 days. Witness contact information becomes harder to obtain as time passes. Vehicle black box data requires prompt legal action to preserve. In construction cases, site conditions change and scaffolding is modified or removed. An attorney can send preservation letters and initiate legal holds before evidence is gone, which is something no amount of money can replicate after the fact.

Cases involving TBIs are heard in the New York Supreme Court, which despite its name is the trial-level court for serious civil claims. Venue depends on where the accident occurred and where the parties reside, meaning a claim might proceed in Manhattan, the Bronx, Brooklyn (Kings County), Queens, or Staten Island (Richmond County). Each courthouse has its own docket practices and judicial temperament, and familiarity with these courts matters when assessing whether early settlement discussions or aggressive litigation posture serves a client better in a given venue.

Valuing a Traumatic Brain Injury Claim Honestly

One of the most consequential mistakes TBI claimants make is accepting a valuation methodology that treats their injury like a soft tissue case with a multiplier. Brain injuries require a fundamentally different economic model. Medical costs for TBI survivors frequently include acute hospitalization, inpatient rehabilitation, outpatient cognitive therapy, psychiatric care, neurological follow-up, and in severe cases, long-term care or residential placement. A life care plan developed by a qualified expert projects these costs over a person’s actuarially expected lifetime and accounts for inflation in healthcare costs, future treatment modalities, and the likelihood of secondary conditions.

Lost earning capacity is often the largest single component of a TBI damages claim and the most contested. If a cognitive deficit prevents someone from returning to their prior occupation, or from working at all, the economic loss stretches over decades. Vocational rehabilitation experts assess what work, if any, a survivor can perform given documented functional limitations. Economists then calculate the present value of the difference between pre-injury earning trajectory and post-injury earning capacity. Defense experts will challenge every assumption in this analysis, which is why the quality of the experts retained and the attorney’s ability to defend their methodology under cross-examination determine whether this component of damages survives to verdict.

Pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and the impact on personal relationships are non-economic damages that New York does not cap in most personal injury cases, unlike some other states. These are real losses that require real advocacy to quantify for a jury that may not understand what it means to live with chronic headaches, word-finding difficulty, emotional dysregulation, or the inability to participate in activities that defined a person’s identity before the accident.

Questions About Traumatic Brain Injury Claims in New York

What is the difference between a mild TBI and a concussion for purposes of a legal claim?

Medically, mild TBI and concussion are often used interchangeably, but the word “mild” is misleading in a legal context. Many people with mild TBI diagnoses experience prolonged symptoms including cognitive difficulty, sleep disruption, headaches, and emotional changes that significantly affect their ability to work and function. The severity designation is based on the initial clinical presentation, not the long-term outcome. A claim for mild TBI can still support substantial damages if the documented functional impact is serious and sustained, and the legal strategy should reflect that distinction rather than accepting the “mild” framing as a ceiling on recovery.

How do New York courts treat TBI claims where initial imaging was normal?

Normal CT or MRI results at initial presentation do not defeat a traumatic brain injury claim. Many TBIs, including diffuse axonal injury and concussive injury, do not appear on standard imaging. Courts and juries in New York regularly hear expert testimony about how neuropsychological testing, functional MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, and documented behavioral changes establish a brain injury diagnosis even when conventional scans appear unremarkable. The defense will attempt to exploit normal imaging, which is exactly why the medical evidence strategy must be built carefully from the beginning of the case.

Can I bring a TBI claim if I was partially at fault for the accident?

New York follows a pure comparative negligence rule, which means that even if you are found partially responsible for the accident, you can still recover damages. Your total award is reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to you. For example, if you are found 30 percent at fault and your damages are assessed at a certain value, you recover 70 percent of that amount. There is no threshold that bars recovery entirely based on your share of fault, unlike states that use modified comparative fault frameworks.

My family member suffered a severe TBI and cannot manage their own affairs. How does that affect the legal process?

When a TBI survivor lacks the legal capacity to manage a lawsuit or make decisions independently, a guardian or guardian ad litem may need to be appointed through the New York courts before or during the legal proceedings. The court approval process for settlements involving incapacitated adults also differs from standard personal injury settlements, requiring judicial review to ensure the settlement is in the person’s best interest. Any structured settlement or trust arrangements must also account for the survivor’s potential eligibility for public benefits, which can be affected by receipt of a lump sum award.

Is there a difference in how I pursue a TBI claim from a construction accident versus a car accident in New York?

Significantly. Construction site TBI claims in New York may implicate Labor Law sections that impose absolute liability on property owners and general contractors for certain categories of worker injury, regardless of the worker’s own conduct. This is a much stronger legal position than standard negligence and completely changes the settlement and litigation dynamics. Motor vehicle TBI claims, by contrast, operate under New York’s no-fault insurance framework, which requires navigating PIP coverage and threshold requirements before accessing the tort system for pain and suffering damages. The underlying facts of where and how the injury occurred determine which legal theories apply and which deadlines govern the claim.

What if my TBI symptoms did not fully develop until weeks after the accident?

Delayed symptom onset is common in TBI cases and does not necessarily invalidate a claim. Many survivors of concussive injury do not recognize the full scope of their cognitive and emotional changes until returning to work or daily routines that demand the affected functions. Documenting when symptoms were first noticed, what activities triggered them, and how they progressed is important for connecting them to the original injury event. Gaps in time between the accident and symptom documentation are something defense attorneys will scrutinize, so building a contemporaneous record through medical providers, employers, and personal accounts is strategically valuable.

Will my workers’ compensation claim affect my personal injury lawsuit if I was injured on the job?

In New York, workers’ compensation is generally the exclusive remedy against an employer for workplace injuries, but it does not preclude a third-party personal injury claim against a party other than the employer, such as a property owner, contractor, equipment manufacturer, or another driver. In construction cases particularly, third-party claims are often more valuable than the workers’ compensation claim alone because they allow recovery of pain and suffering and full lost wages rather than the limited wage replacement workers’ compensation provides. The two claims run on parallel tracks, though the employer or its insurer may assert a lien against the third-party recovery for benefits already paid.

How long does a traumatic brain injury lawsuit typically take to resolve in New York City courts?

TBI litigation in New York City courts is rarely resolved quickly. The complexity of the medical evidence, the volume of discovery, and the coordination of expert witnesses mean that cases routinely take two to four years from filing to resolution, whether by settlement or verdict. Court dockets in Manhattan, Brooklyn, and other boroughs vary in their pace. Some TBI cases settle during or after the note of issue is filed and trial is imminent, because the pressure of an approaching trial date concentrates the defense’s settlement posture. Others proceed to verdict. There is no universal timeline, and anyone who promises a quick resolution for a serious TBI claim should be viewed with caution.

Can I recover damages for how my TBI has affected my relationships and family life?

Yes. In New York, non-economic damages in personal injury cases include loss of enjoyment of life, which encompasses the inability to participate in activities, hobbies, and relationships that were meaningful before the injury. A spouse of a TBI survivor may also have a derivative loss of consortium claim in some circumstances, which addresses the impact of the injury on the marital relationship. These are recognized categories of loss, and evidence supporting them typically comes from the injured person’s testimony, family members, treating providers, and neuropsychological evaluation of functional impact.

What happens if the person who caused my TBI does not have enough insurance coverage?

Underinsurance and inadequate coverage are practical realities in many TBI cases. If the at-fault party’s liability coverage is insufficient to cover the full value of the claim, your own underinsured motorist coverage, if applicable, may provide additional recovery. In premises liability or construction cases, there may be multiple potentially liable parties, each with their own coverage, which is why a thorough investigation into the full liability picture matters early. Excess or umbrella policies held by defendants may also be available. Identifying all possible sources of recovery is part of what a thorough case evaluation should address before any strategic decisions are made.

TBI Attorney Representation Across New York City and the Surrounding Region

Mark David Shirian P.C. represents traumatic brain injury clients throughout the five boroughs of New York City and across New York State. In Manhattan, the firm serves clients from neighborhoods including Harlem, Washington Heights, the Upper East Side, Midtown, Chelsea, the Financial District, and Tribeca. Across Brooklyn, clients from Crown Heights, Flatbush, Bay Ridge, Bushwick, Williamsburg, East New York, Bensonhurst, and Sunset Park have brought TBI matters to the firm. In Queens, the firm serves areas including Flushing, Jamaica, Astoria, Jackson Heights, Forest Hills, Richmond Hill, and Long Island City. Bronx clients from Fordham, Mott Haven, Pelham, Hunts Point, and Co-op City, as well as Staten Island clients across St. George, New Dorp, and Tottenville, are also represented. Beyond the five boroughs, the firm extends its personal injury representation to clients across Nassau County, Suffolk County, Westchester County, and other areas of New York State where serious TBI claims arise. Wherever in the New York region the accident occurred and wherever the client resides, the firm’s approach remains the same: careful case evaluation, assertive advocacy, and honest communication about what recovery actually looks like.

Speak with a New York City Traumatic Brain Injury Attorney About Your Case

The decisions made in the months following a traumatic brain injury shape the entire trajectory of a legal claim. Evidence is gathered or it is lost. Experts are retained or the defense builds its narrative unopposed. Valuations are developed carefully or cases are resolved for a fraction of what full compensation would require. A New York City traumatic brain injury attorney from Mark David Shirian P.C. can assess your situation honestly, identify the parties responsible, and build a case that reflects the actual cost and impact of what happened to you and your family.

Attorney Mark D. Shirian and Senior Associate Shawn D. Shirian handle serious injury cases with the kind of attention that cases of this magnitude require. If you or someone you care about has sustained a brain injury in an accident in New York City or elsewhere in New York State, contact Mark David Shirian P.C. today to schedule a confidential case evaluation.

Dedicated To the satisfaction of our clients
He worked very hard to get the outcome that we both were looking for.

“In March of 2017, I had a wrongful job termination that distressed me… Read More

Mark pays close attention to details that are important for your case. I recommend him.

“An amazing attorney goes above and beyond for his clients. Mark pays close… Read More

Very compassionate and hard-working lawyer.

“Very compassionate and hard-working lawyer, fights hard for me and keeps me informed,… Read More

* Required Field

By submitting this form I acknowledge that contacting Mark David Shirian P.C. through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege. Furthermore, by submitting this form, I agree to be contacted about my request & other information using automated technology. (Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel.)
Acceptable Use Policy

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms